Paper detail

$^{42}$Ca and $^{50}$Ca with the (Many- and Few-body) Unified Method

A new method unifying many and few-body aspects of nuclear structure has recently been introduced \cite{hov18}. This method combines the many-body description of a core and the few-body structure of this core surrounded by two valence nucleons. For this reason this method is expected to work specially well when applied to nuclei close to the driplines, where the few-body halo structure with one or more nucleons outside the core is established. In this work we apply the new method to nuclei close to the valley of stability, with $^{42}$Ca and $^{50}$Ca as illustrations. We compare the results from uncorrelated mean-field calculations with the ones obtained with the unified method allowing arbitrary correlations in the valence space. We find that the unified method provides results rather similar, although distinguishable, to the Hartree-Fock calculations. The correlations are much less pronounced than at the driplines, which initially were targets for the unified method. The halo structure is not artificially maintained, but the correlations are here demonstrated to be applicable to well-bound nuclei. Excited states built on valence degrees of freedom are calculated for the same nuclei.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.