Paper detail

4$π$ detector for study of Zeno effect using 220Rn -> 216Po alpha->alpha correlated chains

First test of the 4pi detector for study of exponential law of radioactive decay and possibility of observation of Zeno effect [1-3], measuring the mean life of 216Po is presented. This detector consists of two surface-barrier n-Si(Au) detectors placed in the close contact ( <1mm) to each other. Th foil is used as a generator of Rn- gas. The foil was covered by nuclear filter with 0.4 mm pores and placed in the bottom of vacuum chamber. So, direct alpha-particles can not reach the detector active surface. The measured half-live of 216Po of 143.5 (0.6) ms is in agreement with literature sources. It is shown, that for the definite source the random background correlation counts are mostly caused by the 220Rn - 216Po alpha activities and that it is not an easy task to decrease a background level of units of percents in the time region >4T1/2. Both, the data acquisition system and the vacuum chamber design are presented in brief.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.