Paper detail

'Deep' Dive into $b \to c$ Anomalies: Standardized and Future-proof Model Selection Using Self-normalizing Neural Networks

Noting the erroneous proclivity of information-theoretic approaches, like the Akaike information criterion (AIC), to select simpler models while performing model selection with a small sample size, we address the problem of new physics model selection in $b\to c τν_τ$ decays in this paper by employing a specific machine learning algorithm (self-normalizing neural networks, a.k.a. SNN) for supervised classification and regression, in a model-independent framework. While the outcomes of the classification with real data-set are compared with AIC, with the SNNs outperforming AIC$_c$ in all aspects of model selection, the regression-outcomes are compared with the results from Bayesian analyses; the obtained parameter spaces differ considerably while keeping maximum posterior (MAP) estimates similar. A few of the two-operator scenarios with a tensor-type interaction are found to be the most probable solution for the data. We also test the effectiveness of our trained networks with the expected, more precise data in Belle-II. The trained networks and associated functionalities are supplied for the use of the community.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.