Paper detail

331 Models Facing the Tensions in $ΔF=2$ Processes with the Impact on $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$, $B_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B\to K^*μ^+μ^-$

Motivated by the recently improved lattice QCD results on the hadronic matrix elements entering $ΔM_{s,d}$ in $B_{s,d}^0-\bar B_{s,d}^0$ mixings and the resulting increased tensions between $ΔM_{s,d}$ and $\varepsilon_K$ in the Standard Model and CMFV models, we demonstrate that these tensions can be removed in 331 models based on the gauge group $SU(3)_C\times SU(3)_L\times U(1)_X$ both for $M_{Z^\prime}$ in the LHC reach and well beyond it. But the implied new physics (NP) patterns in $ΔF=1$ observables depend sensitively on the value of $|V_{cb}|$. Concentrating the analysis on three 331 models that have been selected by us previously on the basis of their performance in electroweak precision tests and $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ we illustrate this for $|V_{cb}|=0.042$ and $|V_{cb}|=0.040$. We find that these new lattice data still allow for positive shifts in $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ up to $6\times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{Z^\prime}=3~TeV$ for both values of $$|V_{cb}|$ but for $M_{Z^\prime}=10~TeV$ only for $|V_{cb}|=0.040$ such shifts can be obtained. NP effects in $B_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and in the Wilson coefficient $C_9$ are significantly larger in all three models for the case of $|V_{cb}|=0.040$. In particular in two models the rate for $B_s\toμ^+μ^-$ can be reduced by NP by $20\%$ for $M_{Z^\prime}=3~TeV$ resulting in values in the ballpark of central values from CMS and LHCb. In the third model a shift in $C_9$ up to $C_9^\text{NP}=-0.5$ is possible. We also consider the simplest 331 model, analyzed recently in the literature, in which $X=Y$, the usual hypercharge. We find that in this model NP effects in flavour observables are much smaller than in the three models with $X\not=Y$, in particular NP contributions to the ratio $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ are very strongly suppressed.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.