Paper detail

$θ_{23}=π/4$ and $δ=-π/2$ In Neutrino Mixing, Which Convention?

Considerable information has been obtained about neutrino mixing matrix. Present data show that in the particle data group (PDG) parameterization, the 2-3 mixing angle and the CP violating phase are consistent with $θ_{23} = π/4$ and $δ_{PDG} = -π/2$, respectively. A lot of efforts have been devoted to constructing models in realizing a mixing matrix with these values. However, the particular angles and phase are parameterization convention dependent. The meaning about the specific values for mixing angle and phase needs to be clarified. Using the well known 9 independent ways of parameterizing the mixing matrix, we show in detail how the mixing angles and phase change with conventions even with the 2-3 mixing angle to be $π/4$ and the CP violating phase to be $-π/2$. The original Kaobayashi-Maskawa and an additional one belong to such a category. The other 6 parameterizations have mixing angles and phase very different values from those in the PDG parameterization although the physical effects are the same. Therefore one should give the specific parameterization convention when making statements about values for mixing angles and phase.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.