Source author record

Junxing Pan

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

hep-ph hep-ex

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

2topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

CP violating phase sum rule $δ^q_{\rm KM}+δ^l_{\rm KM}=0$ for CKM and PMNS matrices

The non-zero Dirac phases $δ^q$ and $δ^l$ in the CKM and PMNS mixing matrices signify CP violation. In general they are independent. Experimental data including recent T2K results show, however, that in the original KM parameterization for the mixing matrix, the sum $δ^q_{\rm KM} + δ^l_{\rm KM}$ is close to zero with $δ^q_{\rm KM}$ to be approximately $π/2$ . The KM parameterization may have provided some hints that these phases are actually related and CP is maximally violated. We show that this sum rule can be accommodated in models with spontaneous CP violation where both phases originate from a non-trivial common spontaneous CP violating maximized phase in the Higgs potential. We find some interesting phenomenological consequences for flavor changing neutral current and CP violation for such a model. In particular, data from $B_s - \bar B_s$ mixing provide very strong constraints on the mass scale for the new neutral scalars in the model, yet the model still allows the electric dipole moments of electron and neutron to reach to their current upper bounds. The model can be tested by near future experiments.

preprint2019arXiv

$θ_{23}=π/4$ and $δ=-π/2$ In Neutrino Mixing, Which Convention?

Considerable information has been obtained about neutrino mixing matrix. Present data show that in the particle data group (PDG) parameterization, the 2-3 mixing angle and the CP violating phase are consistent with $θ_{23} = π/4$ and $δ_{PDG} = -π/2$ , respectively. A lot of efforts have been devoted to constructing models in realizing a mixing matrix with these values. However, the particular angles and phase are parameterization convention dependent. The meaning about the specific values for mixing angle and phase needs to be clarified. Using the well known 9 independent ways of parameterizing the mixing matrix, we show in detail how the mixing angles and phase change with conventions even with the 2-3 mixing angle to be $π/4$ and the CP violating phase to be $-π/2$ . The original Kaobayashi-Maskawa and an additional one belong to such a category. The other 6 parameterizations have mixing angles and phase very different values from those in the PDG parameterization although the physical effects are the same. Therefore one should give the specific parameterization convention when making statements about values for mixing angles and phase.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Junxing Pan

Research overview

Is this your work?

2 publications

CP violating phase sum rule $δ^q_{\rm KM}+δ^l_{\rm KM}=0$ for CKM and PMNS matrices

$θ_{23}=π/4$ and $δ=-π/2$ In Neutrino Mixing, Which Convention?

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Junxing Pan

Research overview

Is this your work?

2 publications

CP violating phase sum rule δKMq+δKMl=0δ^q_{\rm KM}+δ^l_{\rm KM}=0δKMq​+δKMl​=0 for CKM and PMNS matrices

θ23=π/4θ_{23}=π/4θ23​=π/4 and δ=−π/2δ=-π/2δ=−π/2 In Neutrino Mixing, Which Convention?

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

CP violating phase sum rule $δ^q_{\rm KM}+δ^l_{\rm KM}=0$ for CKM and PMNS matrices

$θ_{23}=π/4$ and $δ=-π/2$ In Neutrino Mixing, Which Convention?