Researcher profile

Junxing Pan

Junxing Pan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

CP violating phase sum rule $δ^q_{\rm KM}+δ^l_{\rm KM}=0$ for CKM and PMNS matrices

The non-zero Dirac phases $δ^q$ and $δ^l$ in the CKM and PMNS mixing matrices signify CP violation. In general they are independent. Experimental data including recent T2K results show, however, that in the original KM parameterization for the mixing matrix, the sum $δ^q_{\rm KM} + δ^l_{\rm KM}$ is close to zero with $δ^q_{\rm KM}$ to be approximately $π/2$. The KM parameterization may have provided some hints that these phases are actually related and CP is maximally violated. We show that this sum rule can be accommodated in models with spontaneous CP violation where both phases originate from a non-trivial common spontaneous CP violating maximized phase in the Higgs potential. We find some interesting phenomenological consequences for flavor changing neutral current and CP violation for such a model. In particular, data from $B_s - \bar B_s$ mixing provide very strong constraints on the mass scale for the new neutral scalars in the model, yet the model still allows the electric dipole moments of electron and neutron to reach to their current upper bounds. The model can be tested by near future experiments.

preprint2019arXiv

$θ_{23}=π/4$ and $δ=-π/2$ In Neutrino Mixing, Which Convention?

Considerable information has been obtained about neutrino mixing matrix. Present data show that in the particle data group (PDG) parameterization, the 2-3 mixing angle and the CP violating phase are consistent with $θ_{23} = π/4$ and $δ_{PDG} = -π/2$, respectively. A lot of efforts have been devoted to constructing models in realizing a mixing matrix with these values. However, the particular angles and phase are parameterization convention dependent. The meaning about the specific values for mixing angle and phase needs to be clarified. Using the well known 9 independent ways of parameterizing the mixing matrix, we show in detail how the mixing angles and phase change with conventions even with the 2-3 mixing angle to be $π/4$ and the CP violating phase to be $-π/2$. The original Kaobayashi-Maskawa and an additional one belong to such a category. The other 6 parameterizations have mixing angles and phase very different values from those in the PDG parameterization although the physical effects are the same. Therefore one should give the specific parameterization convention when making statements about values for mixing angles and phase.