Paper detail

2004 IMS Medallion Lecture: Local Rademacher complexities and oracle inequalities in risk minimization

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a class of measurable functions $f:S\mapsto [0,1]$ defined on a probability space $(S,\mathcal{A},P)$. Given a sample (X_1,...,X_n) of i.i.d. random variables taking values in S with common distribution P, let P_n denote the empirical measure based on (X_1,...,X_n). We study an empirical risk minimization problem $P_nf\to \min$, $f\in \mathcal{F}$. Given a solution $\hat{f}_n$ of this problem, the goal is to obtain very general upper bounds on its excess risk \[\mathcal{E}_P(\hat{f}_n):=P\hat{f}_n-\inf_{f\in \mathcal{F}}Pf,\] expressed in terms of relevant geometric parameters of the class $\mathcal{F}$. Using concentration inequalities and other empirical processes tools, we obtain both distribution-dependent and data-dependent upper bounds on the excess risk that are of asymptotically correct order in many examples. The bounds involve localized sup-norms of empirical and Rademacher processes indexed by functions from the class. We use these bounds to develop model selection techniques in abstract risk minimization problems that can be applied to more specialized frameworks of regression and classification.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.