Graph explorer

Toxic Liquidation Spirals

On November 22nd 2022, the lending platform AAVE v2 (on Ethereum) incurred bad debt resulting from a major liquidation event involving a single user who had borrowed close to \$40M of CRV tokens using USDC as collateral. This incident has prompted the Aave community to consider changes to its liquidation threshold, and limitations on the number of illiquid coins that can be borrowed on the platform. In this paper, we argue that the bad debt incurred by AAVE was not due to excess volatility in CRV/USDC price activity on that day, but rather a fundamental flaw in the liquidation logic which triggered a toxic liquidation spiral on the platform. We note that this flaw, which is shared by a number of major DeFi lending markets, can be easily overcome with simple changes to the incentives driving liquidations. We claim that halting all liquidations once a user's loan-to-value (LTV) ratio surpasses a certain threshold value can prevent future toxic liquidation spirals and offer substantial improvement in the bad debt that a lending market can expect to incur. Furthermore, we strongly argue that protocols should enact dynamic liquidation incentives and closing factor policies moving forward for optimal management of protocol risk.

6 nodes5 linksoverview previewToxic Liquidation Spirals
6 nodes5 links
Toxic Liquidation Spirals6 visible / 6 total nodes / 8 links
Co-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalWToxic Liquidation Spiralspreprint / 2023AJakub WarmuzResearcherAAmit ChaudharyResearcherADaniele PinnaResearcherTecon.GN1138 worksTq-fin.EC1147 works
PaperSignal 105 links

Toxic Liquidation Spirals

preprint / 2023

Open