BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Graph explorer

Representability in Supergeometry

In this paper we use the notion of Grothendieck topology to present a unified way to approach representability in supergeometry, which applies to both the differential and algebraic settings.

7 nodes6 linksoverview mapRepresentability in Supergeometry
SearchCollections
7 nodes6 links
Representability in Supergeometry7 visible / 7 total nodes / 7 links
Co-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalWRepresentability in Supergeometrypreprint / 2016AR. FioresiResearcherAF. ZanchettaResearcherTmath-ph7974 worksTmath.MP7972 worksTmath.AG5393 worksTmath.RA2176 works
PaperSignal 106 links

Representability in Supergeometry

preprint / 2016

Open

Personal maps

Sign in to save graph views

Saved views keep the query, focus and filters attached so you can return to the same research slice later.

Sign in

Public snapshots

1 shared view(s)