Graph explorer

Anomalous Vacillatory Learning

In 1986, Osherson, Stob and Weinstein asked whether two variants of anomalous vacillatory learning, TxtFex^*_* and TxtFext^*_*, could be distinguished. In both, a machine is permitted to vacillate between a finite number of hypotheses and to make a finite number of errors. TxtFext^*_*-learning requires that hypotheses output infinitely often must describe the same finite variant of the correct set, while TxtFex^*_*-learning permits the learner to vacillate between finitely many different finite variants of the correct set. In this paper we show that TxtFex^*_* \neq TxtFext^*_*, thereby answering the question posed by Osherson, \textit{et al}. We prove this in a strong way by exhibiting a family in TxtFex^*_2 \setminus {TxtFext}^*_*.

5 nodes6 linksoverview mapAnomalous Vacillatory Learning
5 nodes6 links
Anomalous Vacillatory Learning5 visible / 5 total nodes / 6 links
Related contextAuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalRelated contextWAnomalous Vacillatory Learningpreprint / 2013AAchilles BerosResearcherTMachine Learning49008 worksTLogic in Computer Science2208 worksTmath.LO1661 works
PaperSignal 104 links

Anomalous Vacillatory Learning

preprint / 2013

Open