BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Zoltán Fülöp

Zoltán Fülöp contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Formal Languages and Automata TheoryLogic in Computer Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Characterizing Weighted MSO for Trees by Branching Transitive Closure Logics

We introduce the branching transitive closure operator on weighted monadic second-order logic formulas where the branching corresponds in a natural way to the branching inherent in trees. For arbitrary commutative semirings, we prove that weighted monadic second order logics on trees is equivalent to the definability by formulas which start with one of the following operators: (i) a branching transitive closure or (ii) an existential second-order quantifier followed by one universal first-order quantifier; in both cases the operator is applied to step-formulas over (a) Boolean first-order logic enriched by modulo counting or (b) Boolean monadic-second order logic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Composition Closure of Linear Extended Top-down Tree Transducers

Linear extended top-down tree transducers (or synchronous tree-substitution grammars) are popular formal models of tree transformations. The expressive power of compositions of such transducers with and without regular look-ahead is investigated. In particular, the restrictions of nondeletion, epsilon-freeness, and strictness are considered. The composition hierarchy turns out to be finite for all epsilon-free (all rules consume input) variants of these transducers except for nondeleting epsilon-free linear extended top-down tree transducers. The least number of transducers needed for the full expressive power of arbitrary compositions is presented. In all remaining cases (including nondeleting epsilon-free linear extended top-down tree transducers) the composition hierarchy does not collapse.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Forward and Backward Application of Symbolic Tree Transducers

We consider symbolic tree automata (sta) and symbolic tree transducers (stt). We characterize s-recognizable tree languages (which are the tree languages recognizable by sta) in terms of (classical) recognizable tree languages and relabelings. We prove that sta and the recently introduced variable tree automata are incomparable with respect to their recognition power. We define symbolic regular tree grammars and characterize s-regular tree languages in terms of regular tree languages and relabelings. As a consequence, we obtain that s-recognizable tree languages are the same as s-regular tree languages. We show that the syntactic composition of two stt computes the composition of the tree transformations computed by each stt, provided that (1) the first one is deterministic or the second one is linear and (2) the first one is total or the second is nondeleting. We consider forward application and backward application of stt and prove that the backward application of an stt to any s-recognizable tree language yields an s-recognizable tree language. We give a linear stt of which the range is not an s-recognizable tree language. We show that the forward application of simple and linear stt preserves s-recognizability. As a corollary, we obtain that the type checking problem of simple and linear stt and the inverse type checking problem of arbitrary stt is decidable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access