Researcher profile

Zihao Wei

Zihao Wei contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Machine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author

5works

0followers

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Circular Reasoning: Understanding Self-Reinforcing Loops in Large Reasoning Models

Despite the success of test-time scaling, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) frequently encounter repetitive loops that lead to computational waste and inference failure. In this paper, we identify a distinct failure mode termed Circular Reasoning. Unlike traditional model degeneration, this phenomenon manifests as a self-reinforcing trap where generated content acts as a logical premise for its own recurrence, compelling the reiteration of preceding text. To systematically analyze this phenomenon, we introduce LoopBench, a dataset designed to capture two distinct loop typologies: numerical loops and statement loops. Mechanistically, we characterize circular reasoning as a state collapse exhibiting distinct boundaries, where semantic repetition precedes textual repetition. We reveal that reasoning impasses trigger the loop onset, which subsequently persists as an inescapable cycle driven by a self-reinforcing V-shaped attention mechanism. Guided by these findings, we employ the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) algorithm to capture these precursors for early loop prediction. Experiments across diverse LRMs validate its accuracy and elucidate the stability of long-chain reasoning.

preprint2026arXiv

Latent-GRPO: Group Relative Policy Optimization for Latent Reasoning

Latent reasoning offers a more efficient alternative to explicit reasoning by compressing intermediate reasoning into continuous representations and substantially shortening reasoning chains. However, existing latent reasoning methods mainly focus on supervised learning, and reinforcement learning in latent space remains highly unstable. We study this problem through the lens of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), and show that directly adapting GRPO to latent reasoning is fundamentally non-trivial: latent reasoning changes both the probability density and the sampling mechanism, causing three coupled bottlenecks: absence of intrinsic latent manifolds, where unconstrained exploration pushes rollouts off the valid latent manifold; exploration-optimization misalignment, where trajectory-level rewards can induce incorrect token-level updates; and latent mixture non-closure, where jointly reinforcing multiple correct latent paths can produce an invalid averaged state. To address them, we propose \textbf{Latent-GRPO}, which combines invalid-sample advantage masking, one-sided noise sampling, and optimal correct-path first-token selection. Across four low-difficulty benchmarks (e.g., GSM8K-Aug) and four high-difficulty benchmarks (e.g., AIME), Latent-GRPO improves over its latent initialization by 7.86 Pass@1 points on low-difficulty tasks and surpasses explicit GRPO by 4.27 points on high-difficulty tasks while using 3--4$\times$ shorter reasoning chains. It also achieves stronger pass@$k$ performance under Gumbel sampling. These results establish Latent-GRPO as an effective approach for stable and efficient latent reasoning.

preprint2026arXiv

The Evolution of Thought: Tracking LLM Overthinking via Reasoning Dynamics Analysis

Test-time scaling via explicit reasoning trajectories significantly boosts large language model (LLM) performance but often triggers overthinking. To explore this, we analyze reasoning through two lenses: Reasoning Length Dynamics, which reveals a compensatory trade-off between thinking and answer content length that eventually leads to thinking redundancy, and Reasoning Semantic Dynamics, which identifies semantic convergence and repetitive oscillations. These dynamics uncover an instance-specific Reasoning Completion Point (RCP), beyond which computation continues without further performance gain. Since the RCP varies across instances, we propose a Reasoning Completion Point Detector (RCPD), an inference-time early-exit method that identifies the RCP by monitoring the rank dynamics of termination tokens (e.g., </think>). Across AIME and GPQA benchmarks using Qwen3 and DeepSeek-R1, RCPD reduces token usage by up to 44% while preserving accuracy, offering a principled approach to efficient test-time scaling.

preprint2025arXiv

Large Language Model Sourcing: A Survey

Due to the black-box nature of large language models (LLMs) and the realism of their generated content, issues such as hallucinations, bias, unfairness, and copyright infringement have become significant. In this context, sourcing information from multiple perspectives is essential. This survey presents a systematic investigation organized around four interrelated dimensions: Model Sourcing, Model Structure Sourcing, Training Data Sourcing, and External Data Sourcing. Moreover, a unified dual-paradigm taxonomy is proposed that classifies existing sourcing methods into prior-based (proactive traceability embedding) and posterior-based (retrospective inference) approaches. Traceability across these dimensions enhances the transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness of LLMs deployment in real-world applications.

preprint2022arXiv

Discovering Intrinsic Reward with Contrastive Random Walk

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the efficacy of using Contrastive Random Walk as a curiosity method to achieve faster convergence to the optimal policy.Contrastive Random Walk defines the transition matrix of a random walk with the help of neural networks. It learns a meaningful state representation with a closed loop. The loss of Contrastive Random Walk serves as an intrinsic reward and is added to the environment reward. Our method works well in non-tabular sparse reward scenarios, in the sense that our method receives the highest reward within the same iterations compared to other methods. Meanwhile, Contrastive Random Walk is more robust. The performance doesn't change much with different random initialization of environments. We also find that adaptive restart and appropriate temperature are crucial to the performance of Contrastive Random Walk.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint