BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Zhijie Ren

Zhijie Ren contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

AlphaBlock: An Evaluation Framework for Blockchain Consensus Protocols

Consensus protocols play a pivotal role to balance security and efficiency in blockchain systems. In this paper, we propose an evaluation framework for blockchain consensus protocols termed as AlphaBlock. In this framework, we compare the overall performance of Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus and Nakamoto Consensus (NC). BFT consensus is reached by multiple rounds of quorum votes from the supermajority, while NC is reached by accumulating credibility with the implicit voting from appending blocks. AlphaBlock incorporates the key concepts of Hotstu BFT (HBFT) and Proof-of-authority (PoA) as the case study of BFT and NC. Using this framework, we compare the throughput and latency of HBFT and PoA with practical network and blockchain configurations. Our results show that the performance of HBFT dominates PoA in most scenarios due to the absence of forks in HBFT. Moreover, we find out a set of optimal configurations in AlphaBlock, which sheds a light for improving the performance of blockchain consensus algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

SURFACE: A Practical Blockchain Consensus Algorithm for Real-World Networks

SURFACE, standing for Secure, Use-case adaptive, and Relatively Fork-free Approach of Chain Extension, is a consensus algorithm that is designed for real-world networks and enjoys the benefits from both the Nakamoto consensus and Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) consensus. In SURFACE, a committee is randomly selected every round to validate and endorse the proposed new block. The size of the committee can be adjusted according to the underlying network to make the blockchain mostly fork-free with a reasonable overhead in communication. Consequently, the blockchain can normally achieve fast probabilistic confirmation with high throughput and low latency. SURFACE also provides a BFT mechanism to guarantee ledger consistency in case of an extreme network situation such as large network partition or being under massive DDoS attacks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access