BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Zhihao Gavin Tang

Zhihao Gavin Tang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputer Science and Game TheoryDiscrete MathematicsMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

15works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

15 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

(Fractional) Online Stochastic Matching via Fine-Grained Offline Statistics

Motivated by display advertising on the internet, the online stochastic matching problem is proposed by Feldman, Mehta, Mirrokni, and Muthukrishnan (FOCS 2009). Consider a stochastic bipartite graph with offline vertices on one side and with i.i.d. online vertices on the other side. The algorithm knows the offline vertices and the distribution of the online vertices in advance. Upon the arrival of each online vertex, its type is realized and the algorithm immediately and irrevocably decides how to match it. In the vertex-weighted version of the problem, each offline vertex is associated with a weight and the goal is to maximize the total weight of the matching. In this paper, we generalize the model to allow non-identical online vertices and focus on the fractional version of the vertex-weighted stochastic matching. We design fractional algorithms that are $0.718$-competitive and $0.731$-competitive for non i.i.d. arrivals and i.i.d. arrivals respectively. We also prove that no fractional algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio better than $0.75$ for non i.i.d. arrivals. Furthermore, we round our fractional algorithms by applying the recently developed multiway online correlated selection by Gao et al. (FOCS 2021) and achieve $0.666$-competitive and $0.704$-competitive integral algorithms for non i.i.d. arrivals and i.i.d. arrivals. Our results for non i.i.d. arrivals are the first algorithms beating the $1-1/e \approx 0.632$ barrier of the classical adversarial setting. Our $0.704$-competitive integral algorithm for i.i.d. arrivals slightly improves the state-of-the-art $0.701$-competitive ratio by Huang and Shu (STOC 2021).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Improved Bounds for Fractional Online Matching Problems

Online bipartite matching with one-sided arrival and its variants have been extensively studied since the seminal work of Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani (STOC 1990). Motivated by real-life applications with dynamic market structures, e.g. ride-sharing, two generalizations of the classical one-sided arrival model are proposed to allow non-bipartite graphs and to allow all vertices to arrive online. Namely, online matching with general vertex arrival is introduced by Wang and Wong (ICALP 2015), and fully online matching is introduced by Huang et al. (JACM 2020). In this paper, we study the fractional versions of the two models. We improve three out of the four state-of-the-art upper and lower bounds of the two models. For fully online matching, we design a $0.6$-competitive algorithm and prove no algorithm can be $0.613$-competitive. For online matching with general vertex arrival, we prove no algorithm can be $0.584$-competitive. Moreover, we give an arguably more intuitive algorithm for the general vertex arrival model, compared to the algorithm of Wang and Wong, while attaining the same competitive ratio of $0.526$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Online Facility Location with Predictions

We provide nearly optimal algorithms for online facility location (OFL) with predictions. In OFL, $n$ demand points arrive in order and the algorithm must irrevocably assign each demand point to an open facility upon its arrival. The objective is to minimize the total connection costs from demand points to assigned facilities plus the facility opening cost. We further assume the algorithm is additionally given for each demand point $x_i$ a natural prediction $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{pred}}$ which is supposed to be the facility $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{opt}}$ that serves $x_i$ in the offline optimal solution. Our main result is an $O(\min\{\log {\frac{nη_\infty}{\mathrm{OPT}}}, \log{n} \})$-competitive algorithm where $η_\infty$ is the maximum prediction error (i.e., the distance between $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{pred}}$ and $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{opt}}$). Our algorithm overcomes the fundamental $Ω(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n})$ lower bound of OFL (without predictions) when $η_\infty$ is small, and it still maintains $O(\log n)$ ratio even when $η_\infty$ is unbounded. Furthermore, our theoretical analysis is supported by empirical evaluations for the tradeoffs between $η_\infty$ and the competitive ratio on various real datasets of different types.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Order Selection Prophet Inequality: From Threshold Optimization to Arrival Time Design

In the classical prophet inequality, a gambler faces a sequence of items, whose values are drawn independently from known distributions. Upon the arrival of each item, its value is realized and the gambler either accepts it and the game ends, or irrevocably rejects it and continues to the next item. The goal is to maximize the value of the selected item and compete against the expected maximum value of all items. A tight competitive ratio of $\frac{1}{2}$ is established in the classical setting and various relaxations have been proposed to surpass the barrier, including the i.i.d. model, the order selection model, and the random order model. In this paper, we advance the study of the order selection prophet inequality, in which the gambler is given the extra power for selecting the arrival order of the items. Our main result is a $0.725$-competitive algorithm, that substantially improves the state-of-the-art $0.669$ ratio by Correa, Saona and Ziliotto~(Math. Program. 2021), achieved in the harder random order model. Recently, Agrawal, Sethuraman and Zhang~(EC 2021) proved that the task of selecting the optimal order is NP-hard. Despite this fact, we introduce a novel algorithm design framework that translates the discrete order selection problem into a continuous arrival time design problem. From this perspective, we can focus on the arrival time design without worrying about the threshold optimization afterwards. As a side result, we achieve the optimal $0.745$ competitive ratio by applying our algorithm to the i.i.d. model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Simple 1-1/e Approximation for Oblivious Bipartite Matching

We study the oblivious matching problem, which aims at finding a maximum matching on a graph with unknown edge set. Any algorithm for the problem specifies an ordering of the vertex pairs. The matching is then produced by probing the pairs following the ordering, and including a pair if both of them are unmatched and there exists an edge between them. The unweighted (Chan et al. (SICOMP 2018)) and the vertex-weighted (Chan et al. (TALG 2018)) versions of the problem are well studied. In this paper, we consider the edge-weighted oblivious matching problem on bipartite graphs, which generalizes the stochastic bipartite matching problem. Very recently, Gamlath et al. (SODA 2019) studied the stochastic bipartite matching problem, and proposed an (1-1/e)-approximate algorithm. We give a very simple algorithm adapted from the Ranking algorithm by Karp et al. (STOC 1990), and show that it achieves the same (1-1/e) approximation ratio for the oblivious matching problem on bipartite graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fully Online Matching II: Beating Ranking and Water-filling

Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani (STOC 1990) initiated the study of online bipartite matching, which has held a central role in online algorithms ever since. Of particular importance are the Ranking algorithm for integral matching and the Water-filling algorithm for fractional matching. Most algorithms in the literature can be viewed as adaptations of these two in the corresponding models. Recently, Huang et al.~(STOC 2018, SODA 2019) introduced a more general model called \emph{fully online matching}, which considers general graphs and allows all vertices to arrive online. They also generalized Ranking and Water-filling to fully online matching and gave some tight analysis: Ranking is $Ω\approx 0.567$-competitive on bipartite graphs where the $Ω$-constant satisfies $Ωe^Ω= 1$, and Water-filling is $2-\sqrt{2} \approx 0.585$-competitive on general graphs. We propose fully online matching algorithms strictly better than Ranking and Water-filling. For integral matching on bipartite graphs, we build on the online primal dual analysis of Ranking and Water-filling to design a $0.569$-competitive hybrid algorithm called Balanced Ranking. To our knowledge, it is the first integral algorithm in the online matching literature that successfully integrates ideas from Water-filling. For fractional matching on general graphs, we give a $0.592$-competitive algorithm called Eager Water-filling, which may match a vertex on its arrival. By contrast, the original Water-filling algorithm always matches vertices at their deadlines. Our result for fractional matching further shows a separation between fully online matching and the general vertex arrival model by Wang and Wong (ICALP 2015), due to an upper bound of $0.5914$ in the latter model by Buchbinder, Segev, and Tkach (ESA 2017).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Generalizing Complex Hypotheses on Product Distributions: Auctions, Prophet Inequalities, and Pandora's Problem

This paper explores a theory of generalization for learning problems on product distributions, complementing the existing learning theories in the sense that it does not rely on any complexity measures of the hypothesis classes. The main contributions are two general sample complexity bounds: (1) $\tilde{O} \big( \frac{nk}{ε^2} \big)$ samples are sufficient and necessary for learning an $ε$-optimal hypothesis in any problem on an $n$-dimensional product distribution, whose marginals have finite supports of sizes at most $k$; (2) $\tilde{O} \big( \frac{n}{ε^2} \big)$ samples are sufficient and necessary for any problem on $n$-dimensional product distributions if it satisfies a notion of strong monotonicity from the algorithmic game theory literature. As applications of these theories, we match the optimal sample complexity for single-parameter revenue maximization (Guo et al., STOC 2019), improve the state-of-the-art for multi-parameter revenue maximization (Gonczarowski and Weinberg, FOCS 2018) and prophet inequality (Correa et al., EC 2019), and provide the first and tight sample complexity bound for Pandora's problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Online Stochastic Matching with Edge Arrivals

Online bipartite matching with edge arrivals remained a major open question for a long time until a recent negative result by [Gamlath et al. FOCS 2019], who showed that no online policy is better than the straightforward greedy algorithm, i.e., no online algorithm has a worst-case competitive ratio better than $0.5$. In this work, we consider the bipartite matching problem with edge arrivals in a natural stochastic framework, i.e., Bayesian setting where each edge of the graph is independently realized according to a known probability distribution. We focus on a natural class of prune & greedy online policies motivated by practical considerations from a multitude of online matching platforms. Any prune & greedy algorithm consists of two stages: first, it decreases the probabilities of some edges in the stochastic instance and then runs greedy algorithm on the pruned graph. We propose prune & greedy algorithms that are $0.552$-competitive on the instances that can be pruned to a $2$-regular stochastic bipartite graph, and $0.503$-competitive on arbitrary bipartite graphs. The algorithms and our analysis significantly deviate from the prior work. We first obtain analytically manageable lower bound on the size of the matching, which leads to a non linear optimization problem. We further reduce this problem to a continuous optimization with a constant number of parameters that can be solved using standard software tools.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Online Stochastic Max-Weight Matching: prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models

We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is drawn independently from an a-priori known probability distribution. Under edge arrival, the weight of each edge is revealed upon arrival, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. Under vertex arrival, the weights of all edges from the newly arriving vertex to all previously arrived vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. To study these settings, we introduce a novel unified framework of batched prophet inequalities that captures online settings where elements arrive in batches; in particular it captures matching under the two aforementioned arrival models. Our algorithms rely on the construction of suitable online contention resolution scheme (OCRS). We first extend the framework of OCRS to batched-OCRS, we then establish a reduction from batched prophet inequality to batched OCRS, and finally we construct batched OCRSs with selectable ratios of 0.337 and 0.5 for edge and vertex arrival models, respectively. Both results improve the state of the art for the corresponding settings. For the vertex arrival, our result is tight. Interestingly, a pricing-based prophet inequality with comparable competitive ratios is unknown.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tight Revenue Gaps among Simple Mechanisms

We consider a fundamental problem in microeconomics: selling a single item to a number of potential buyers, whose values are drawn from known independent and regular (not necessarily identical) distributions. There are four widely-used and widely-studied mechanisms in the literature: {\sf Myerson Auction}~({\sf OPT}), {\sf Sequential Posted-Pricing}~({\sf SPM}), {\sf Second-Price Auction with Anonymous Reserve}~({\sf AR}), and {\sf Anonymous Pricing}~({\sf AP}). {\sf OPT} is revenue-optimal but complicated, which also experiences several issues in practice such as fairness; {\sf AP} is the simplest mechanism, but also generates the lowest revenue among these four mechanisms; {\sf SPM} and {\sf AR} are of intermediate complexity and revenue. We explore revenue gaps among these mechanisms, each of which is defined as the largest ratio between revenues from a pair of mechanisms. We establish two tight bounds and one improved bound: 1. {\sf SPM} vs.\ {\sf AP}: this ratio studies the power of discrimination in pricing schemes. We obtain the tight ratio of $\mathcal{C^*} \approx 2.62$, closing the gap between $\big[\frac{e}{e - 1}, e\big]$ left before. 2. {\sf AR} vs.\ {\sf AP}: this ratio measures the relative power of auction scheme vs.\ pricing scheme, when no discrimination is allowed. We attain the tight ratio of $\frac{π^2}{6} \approx 1.64$, closing the previously known bounds $\big[\frac{e}{e - 1}, e\big]$. 3. {\sf OPT} vs.\ {\sf AR}: this ratio quantifies the power of discrimination in auction schemes, and is previously known to be somewhere between $\big[2, e\big]$. The lower-bound of $2$ was conjectured to be tight by Hartline and Roughgarden (2009) and Alaei et al.\ (2015). We acquire a better lower-bound of $2.15$, and thus disprove this conjecture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Towards a Better Understanding of Randomized Greedy Matching

There has been a long history for studying randomized greedy matching algorithms since the work by Dyer and Frieze~(RSA 1991). We follow this trend and consider the problem formulated in the oblivious setting, in which the algorithm makes (random) decisions that are essentially oblivious to the input graph. We revisit the \textsf{Modified Randomized Greedy (MRG)} algorithm by Aronson et al.~(RSA 1995) that is proved to be $(0.5+ε)$-approximate. In particular, we study a weaker version of the algorithm named \textsf{Random Decision Order (RDO)} that in each step, randomly picks an unmatched vertex and matches it to an arbitrary neighbor if exists. We prove the \textsf{RDO} algorithm is $0.639$-approximate and $0.531$-approximate for bipartite graphs and general graphs respectively. As a corollary, we substantially improve the approximation ratio of \textsf{MRG}. Furthermore, we generalize the \textsf{RDO} algorithm to the edge-weighted case and prove that it achieves a $0.501$ approximation ratio. This result solves the open question by Chan et al.~(SICOMP 2018) about the existence of an algorithm that beats greedy in this setting. As a corollary, it also solves the open questions by Gamlath et al.~(SODA 2019) in the stochastic setting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On ($1$, $ε$)-Restricted Max-Min Fair Allocation Problem

We study the max-min fair allocation problem in which a set of $m$ indivisible items are to be distributed among $n$ agents such that the minimum utility among all agents is maximized. In the restricted setting, the utility of each item $j$ on agent $i$ is either $0$ or some non-negative weight $w_j$. For this setting, Asadpour et al. showed that a certain configuration-LP can be used to estimate the optimal value within a factor of $4+δ$, for any $δ>0$, which was recently extended by Annamalai et al. to give a polynomial-time $13$-approximation algorithm for the problem. For hardness results, Bezakova and Dani showed that it is \NP-hard to approximate the problem within any ratio smaller than $2$. In this paper we consider the $(1,ε)$-restricted max-min fair allocation problem in which each item $j$ is either heavy $(w_j = 1)$ or light $(w_j = ε)$, for some parameter $ε\in (0,1)$. We show that the $(1,ε)$-restricted case is also \NP-hard to approximate within any ratio smaller than $2$. Hence, this simple special case is still algorithmically interesting. Using the configuration-LP, we are able to estimate the optimal value of the problem within a factor of $3+δ$, for any $δ>0$. Extending this idea, we also obtain a quasi-polynomial time $(3+4ε)$-approximation algorithm and a polynomial time $9$-approximation algorithm. Moreover, we show that as $ε$ tends to $0$, the approximation ratio of our polynomial-time algorithm approaches $3+2\sqrt{2}\approx 5.83$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Online Submodular Maximization with Free Disposal: Randomization Beats 0.25 for Partition Matroids

We study the online submodular maximization problem with free disposal under a matroid constraint. Elements from some ground set arrive one by one in rounds, and the algorithm maintains a feasible set that is independent in the underlying matroid. In each round when a new element arrives, the algorithm may accept the new element into its feasible set and possibly remove elements from it, provided that the resulting set is still independent. The goal is to maximize the value of the final feasible set under some monotone submodular function, to which the algorithm has oracle access. For $k$-uniform matroids, we give a deterministic algorithm with competitive ratio at least $0.2959$, and the ratio approaches $\frac{1}{α_\infty} \approx 0.3178$ as $k$ approaches infinity, improving the previous best ratio of $0.25$ by Chakrabarti and Kale (IPCO 2014), Buchbinder et al. (SODA 2015) and Chekuri et al. (ICALP 2015). We also show that our algorithm is optimal among a class of deterministic monotone algorithms that accept a new arriving element only if the objective is strictly increased. Further, we prove that no deterministic monotone algorithm can be strictly better than $0.25$-competitive even for partition matroids, the most modest generalization of $k$-uniform matroids, matching the competitive ratio by Chakrabarti and Kale (IPCO 2014) and Chekuri et al. (ICALP 2015). Interestingly, we show that randomized algorithms are strictly more powerful by giving a (non-monotone) randomized algorithm for partition matroids with ratio $\frac{1}{α_\infty} \approx 0.3178$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Spectral Properties of Hypergraph Laplacian and Approximation Algorithms

The celebrated Cheeger's Inequality establishes a bound on the edge expansion of a graph via its spectrum. This inequality is central to a rich spectral theory of graphs, based on studying the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the adjacency matrix (and other related matrices) of graphs. It has remained open to define a suitable spectral model for hypergraphs whose spectra can be used to estimate various combinatorial properties of the hypergraph. In this paper we introduce a new hypergraph Laplacian operator generalizing the Laplacian matrix of graphs. In particular, the operator is induced by a diffusion process on the hypergraph, such that within each hyperedge, measure flows from vertices having maximum weighted measure to those having minimum. Since the operator is non-linear, we have to exploit other properties of the diffusion process to recover a spectral property concerning the "second eigenvalue" of the resulting Laplacian. Moreover, we show that higher order spectral properties cannot hold in general using the current framework. We consider a stochastic diffusion process, in which each vertex also experiences Brownian noise from outside the system. We show a relationship between the second eigenvalue and the convergence behavior of the process. We show that various hypergraph parameters like multi-way expansion and diameter can be bounded using this operator's spectral properties. Since higher order spectral properties do not hold for the Laplacian operator, we instead use the concept of procedural minimizers to consider higher order Cheeger-like inequalities. For any positive integer $k$, we give a polynomial time algorithm to compute an $O(\log r)$-approximation to the $k$-th procedural minimizer, where $r$ is the maximum cardinality of a hyperedge. We show that this approximation factor is optimal under the SSE hypothesis for constant values of $k$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Spectral Properties of Laplacian and Stochastic Diffusion Process for Edge Expansion in Hypergraphs

There has been recent work [Louis STOC 2015] to analyze the spectral properties of hypergraphs with respect to edge expansion. In particular, a diffusion process is defined on a hypergraph such that within each hyperedge, measure flows from nodes having maximum weighted measure to those having minimum. The diffusion process determines a Laplacian, whose spectral properties are related to the edge expansion properties of the hypergraph. It is suggested that in the above diffusion process, within each hyperedge, measure should flow uniformly in the complete bipartite graph from nodes with maximum weighted measure to those with minimum. However, we discover that this method has some technical issues. First, the diffusion process would not be well-defined. Second, the resulting Laplacian would not have the claimed spectral properties. In this paper, we show that the measure flow between the above two sets of nodes must be coordinated carefully over different hyperedges in order for the diffusion process to be well-defined, from which a Laplacian can be uniquely determined. Since the Laplacian is non-linear, we have to exploit other properties of the diffusion process to recover a spectral property concerning the "second eigenvalue" of the resulting Laplacian. Moreover, we show that higher order spectral properties cannot hold in general using the current framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access