Researcher profile

Zhenhua Duan

Zhenhua Duan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Making Streett Determinization Tight

Optimal determinization construction of Streett automata is an important research problem because it is indispensable in numerous applications such as decision problems for tree temporal logics, logic games and system synthesis. This paper presents a transformation from nondeterministic Streett automata (NSA) with $n$ states and $k$ Streett pairs to equivalent deterministic Rabin transition automata (DRTA) with $n^{5n}(n!)^{n}$ states, $O(n^{n^2})$ Rabin pairs for $k=ω(n)$ and $n^{5n}k^{nk}$ states, $O(k^{nk})$ Rabin pairs for $k=O(n)$. This improves the state of the art Streett determinization construction with $n^{5n}(n!)^{n+1}$ states, $O(n^2)$ Rabin pairs and $n^{5n}k^{nk}n!$ states, $O(nk)$ Rabin pairs, respectively. Moreover, deterministic parity transition automata (DPTA) are obtained with $3(n(n+1)-1)!(n!)^{n+1}$ states, $2n(n+1)$ priorities for $k=ω(n)$ and $3(n(k+1)-1)!n!k^{nk}$ states, $2n(k+1)$ priorities for $k=O(n)$, which improves the best construction with $n^{n}(k+1)^{n(k+1)}(n(k+1)-1)!$ states, $2n(k+1)$ priorities. Further, we prove a lower bound state complexity for determinization construction from NSA to deterministic Rabin (transition) automata i.e. $n^{5n}(n!)^{n}$ for $k=ω(n)$ and $n^{5n}k^{nk}$ for $k=O(n)$, which matches the state complexity of the proposed determinization construction. Besides, we put forward a lower bound state complexity for determinization construction from NSA to deterministic parity (transition) automata i.e. $2^{Ω(n^2 \log n)}$ for $k=ω(n)$ and $2^{Ω(nk \log nk)}$ for $k=O(n)$, which is the same as the state complexity of the proposed determinization construction in the exponent.

preprint2010arXiv

Making Abstraction Refinement Efficient in Model Checking

Abstraction is one of the most important strategies for dealing with the state space explosion problem in model checking. In the abstract model, although the state space is largely reduced, however, a counterexample found in such a model may not be a real counterexample. And the abstract model needs to be further refined where an NP-hard state separation problem is often involved. In this paper, a novel method is presented by adding extra variables to the abstract model for the refinement. With this method, not only the NP-hard state separation problem is avoided, but also a smaller refined abstract model is obtained.