BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yuxin Xiao

Yuxin Xiao contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageMachine LearningCryptography and Securitycs.CYphysics.soc-phSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

In the Name of Fairness: Assessing the Bias in Clinical Record De-identification

Data sharing is crucial for open science and reproducible research, but the legal sharing of clinical data requires the removal of protected health information from electronic health records. This process, known as de-identification, is often achieved through the use of machine learning algorithms by many commercial and open-source systems. While these systems have shown compelling results on average, the variation in their performance across different demographic groups has not been thoroughly examined. In this work, we investigate the bias of de-identification systems on names in clinical notes via a large-scale empirical analysis. To achieve this, we create 16 name sets that vary along four demographic dimensions: gender, race, name popularity, and the decade of popularity. We insert these names into 100 manually curated clinical templates and evaluate the performance of nine public and private de-identification methods. Our findings reveal that there are statistically significant performance gaps along a majority of the demographic dimensions in most methods. We further illustrate that de-identification quality is affected by polysemy in names, gender context, and clinical note characteristics. To mitigate the identified gaps, we propose a simple and method-agnostic solution by fine-tuning de-identification methods with clinical context and diverse names. Overall, it is imperative to address the bias in existing methods immediately so that downstream stakeholders can build high-quality systems to serve all demographic parties fairly.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Amortized Auto-Tuning: Cost-Efficient Bayesian Transfer Optimization for Hyperparameter Recommendation

With the surge in the number of hyperparameters and training times of modern machine learning models, hyperparameter tuning is becoming increasingly expensive. However, after assessing 40 tuning methods systematically, we find that each faces certain limitations. In particular, methods that speed up tuning via knowledge transfer typically require the final performance of hyperparameters and do not focus on low-fidelity information. As we demonstrate empirically, this common practice is suboptimal and can incur an unnecessary use of resources. It is more cost-efficient to instead leverage low-fidelity tuning observations to measure inter-task similarity and transfer knowledge from existing to new tasks accordingly. However, performing multi-fidelity tuning comes with its own challenges in the transfer setting: the noise in additional observations and the need for performance forecasting. Therefore, we propose and conduct a thorough analysis of a multi-task multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization framework, which leads to the best instantiation--amortized auto-tuning (AT2). We further present an offline-computed 27-task hyperparameter recommendation (HyperRec) database to serve the community. Extensive experiments on HyperRec and other real-world databases illustrate the effectiveness of our AT2 method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level Relation Extraction

Stepping from sentence-level to document-level, the research on relation extraction (RE) confronts increasing text length and more complicated entity interactions. Consequently, it is more challenging to encode the key information sources--relevant contexts and entity types. However, existing methods only implicitly learn to model these critical information sources while being trained for RE. As a result, they suffer the problems of ineffective supervision and uninterpretable model predictions. In contrast, we propose to explicitly teach the model to capture relevant contexts and entity types by supervising and augmenting intermediate steps (SAIS) for RE. Based on a broad spectrum of carefully designed tasks, our proposed SAIS method not only extracts relations of better quality due to more effective supervision, but also retrieves the corresponding supporting evidence more accurately so as to enhance interpretability. By assessing model uncertainty, SAIS further boosts the performance via evidence-based data augmentation and ensemble inference while reducing the computational cost. Eventually, SAIS delivers state-of-the-art RE results on three benchmarks (DocRED, CDR, and GDA) and outperforms the runner-up by 5.04% relatively in F1 score in evidence retrieval on DocRED.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Discovering Strategic Behaviors for Collaborative Content-Production in Social Networks

Some social networks provide explicit mechanisms to allocate social rewards such as reputation based on user activity, while the mechanism is more opaque in other networks. Nonetheless, there are always individuals who obtain greater rewards and reputation than their peers. An intuitive yet important question to ask is whether these successful users employ strategic behaviors to become influential. It might appear that the influencers have gamed the system. However, it remains difficult to conclude the rationality of their actions due to factors like the combinatorial strategy space, inability to determine payoffs, and resource limitations faced by individuals. The challenging nature of this question has drawn attention from both the theory and data mining communities. Therefore, in this paper, we are motivated to investigate if resource-limited individuals discover strategic behaviors associated with high payoffs when producing collaborative or interactive content in social networks. We propose a novel framework of Dynamic Dual Attention Networks or DDAN which models content production strategies of users through a generative process, under the influence of social interactions involved in the process. Extensive experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of our model in modeling user behavior. We make three strong empirical findings. Different strategies give rise to different social payoffs, the best performing individuals exhibit stability in their preference over the discovered strategies, which indicates the emergence of strategic behavior, and the stability of strategy preference is correlated with high payoffs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access