Source author record

Yurii Khomskii

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

5 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Bounded Symbiosis and Upwards Reflection

Bagaria and Väänänen developed a framework for studying the large cardinal strength of downwards Löwenheim-Skolem theorems and related set theoretic reflection properties. The main tool was the notion of symbiosis, originally introduced by the third author. Symbiosis provides a way of relating model theoretic properties of strong logics to definability in set theory. In this paper we continue the systematic investigation of symbiosis and apply it to upwards Löwenheim-Skolem theorems and reflection principles. To achieve this, we need to adapt the notion of symbiosis to a new form, called bounded symbiosis. As one easy application, we obtain upper and lower bounds for the large cardinal strength of upwards Löwenheim-Skolem-type principles for second order logic.

preprint2020arXiv

Laver Trees in the Generalized Baire Space

We prove that any suitable generalization of Laver forcing to the space κκ κ^κ, for uncountable regular κκ, necessarily adds a Cohen κκ-real. We also study a dichotomy and an ideal naturally related to generalized Laver forcing. Using this dichotomy, we prove the following stronger result: if κ<κ=κ κ^{<κ}=κ, then every <κ<κ-distributive tree forcing on κκκ^κ adding a dominating κκ-real which is the image of the generic under a continuous function in the ground model, adds a Cohen κκ-real. This is a contribution to the study of generalized Baire spaces and answers a question from arXiv:1611.08140

preprint2015arXiv

Almost disjoint refinements and mixing reals

We investigate families of subsets of ωω with almost disjoint refinements in the classical case as well as with respect to given ideals on ωω. More precisely, we study the following topics and questions: 1) Examples of projective ideals. 2) We prove the following generalization of a result due to J. Brendle: If V⊆WV\subseteq W are transitive models, ω1W⊆Vω_1^W\subseteq V, P(ω)∩V≠P(ω)∩W\mathcal{P}(ω)\cap V\not = \mathcal{P}(ω)\cap W, and I\mathcal{I} is an analytic or coanalytic ideal coded in VV, then there is an I\mathcal{I}-almost disjoint refinement (I\mathcal{I}-ADR) of I+∩V\mathcal{I}^+\cap V in WW, that is, a family {AX:X∈I+∩V}∈W\{A_X:X\in\mathcal{I}^+\cap V\}\in W such that (i) AX⊆XA_X\subseteq X, AX∈I+A_X\in \mathcal{I}^+ for every XX and (ii) AX∩AY∈IA_X\cap A_Y\in\mathcal{I} for every distinct XX and YY. 3) The existence of perfect I\mathcal{I}-almost disjoint (I\mathcal{I}-AD) families, and the existence of a "nice" ideal I\mathcal{I} on ωω with the property: Every I\mathcal{I}-AD family is countable but I\mathcal{I} is nowhere maximal. 4) The existence of (I,Fin)(\mathcal{I},\text{Fin})-almost disjoint refinements of families of I\mathcal{I}-positive sets in the case of everywhere meager (e.g. analytic or coanalytic) ideals. We prove a positive result under Martin's Axiom. 5) Connections between classical properties of forcing notions and adding mixing reals (and mixing injections), that is, a (one-to-one) function f:ω→ωf:ω\toω such that ∣f[X]∩Y∣=ω|f[X]\cap Y|=ω for every X,Y∈[ω]ω∩VX,Y\in [ω]^ω\cap V.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.