Source author record

Barnabás Farkas

Barnabás Farkas appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.LO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Towers in filters, cardinal invariants, and Luzin type families

We investigate which filters on $ω$ can contain towers, that is, a modulo finite descending sequence without any pseudointersection (in $[ω]^ω$). We prove the following results: - Many classical examples of nice tall filters contain no towers (in ZFC). - It is consistent that tall analytic P-filters contain towers of arbitrary regular height (simultaneously for many regular cardinals as well). - It is consistent that all towers generate non-meager filters, in particular (consistently) Borel filters do not contain towers. - The statement "Every ultrafilter contains towers." is independent of ZFC. Furthermore, we study many possible logical (non)implications between the existence of towers in filters, inequalities between cardinal invariants of filters ($\mbox{add}^*(\mathcal F)$, $\mbox{cof}^*(\mathcal F)$, $\mbox{non}^*(\mathcal F)$, and $\mbox{cov}^*(\mathcal F)$), and the existence of Luzin type families (of size $\geq ω_2$), that is, if $\mathcal F$ is a filter then $X\subseteq [ω]^ω$ is an $\mathcal F$-Luzin family if $\{A\in X:|A\setminus F|=ω\}$ is countable for every $F\in \mathcal F$.

preprint2015arXiv

Almost disjoint refinements and mixing reals

We investigate families of subsets of $ω$ with almost disjoint refinements in the classical case as well as with respect to given ideals on $ω$. More precisely, we study the following topics and questions: 1) Examples of projective ideals. 2) We prove the following generalization of a result due to J. Brendle: If $V\subseteq W$ are transitive models, $ω_1^W\subseteq V$, $\mathcal{P}(ω)\cap V\not = \mathcal{P}(ω)\cap W$, and $\mathcal{I}$ is an analytic or coanalytic ideal coded in $V$, then there is an $\mathcal{I}$-almost disjoint refinement ($\mathcal{I}$-ADR) of $\mathcal{I}^+\cap V$ in $W$, that is, a family $\{A_X:X\in\mathcal{I}^+\cap V\}\in W$ such that (i) $A_X\subseteq X$, $A_X\in \mathcal{I}^+$ for every $X$ and (ii) $A_X\cap A_Y\in\mathcal{I}$ for every distinct $X$ and $Y$. 3) The existence of perfect $\mathcal{I}$-almost disjoint ($\mathcal{I}$-AD) families, and the existence of a "nice" ideal $\mathcal{I}$ on $ω$ with the property: Every $\mathcal{I}$-AD family is countable but $\mathcal{I}$ is nowhere maximal. 4) The existence of $(\mathcal{I},\text{Fin})$-almost disjoint refinements of families of $\mathcal{I}$-positive sets in the case of everywhere meager (e.g. analytic or coanalytic) ideals. We prove a positive result under Martin's Axiom. 5) Connections between classical properties of forcing notions and adding mixing reals (and mixing injections), that is, a (one-to-one) function $f:ω\toω$ such that $|f[X]\cap Y|=ω$ for every $X,Y\in [ω]^ω\cap V$.

preprint2010arXiv

More on cardinal invariants of analytic P-ideals

Given an ideal $I$ on $ω$ let $a(I) $ ($\bar{a}(I)$) be minimum of the cardinalities of infinite (uncountable) maximal $I$-almost disjoint subsets of $[ω]^ω$, and denote $b_I$ and$d_I$ the unbounding and dominating numbers of $(ω^ω,\le_I)$. We show that (1) $a(I)>omega$ if $I$ is a summable ideal; (2) $a(Z)=ω$ and $\bar{a}(Z)\le a$ if $Z$ is a tall density ideal, (3) $b\le \bar{a}(I)$, and $b_I=b$ and $d_I=d$, for any analytic P-ideal $I$ on $ω$. Given an analytic $P$-ideal $I$ we investigate the relationship between the Sack, the $I$-bounding, $I$-dominating and $ω^ω$-bounding properties of a given poset $P$. For example, for the density zero ideal $Z$ we can prove: (i) a poset $P$ is $Z$-bounding iff it has the Sacks property, (ii) if $P$ adds a slalom capturing all ground model reals then $P$ is $Z$-dominating.