Source author record

Yulong Zhuang

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
6topics
4close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2020arXiv

3D diffractive imaging of nanoparticle ensembles using an X-ray laser

We report the 3D structure determination of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) by X-ray single particle imaging (SPI). Around 10 million diffraction patterns from gold nanoparticles were measured in less than 100 hours of beam time, more than 100 times the amount of data in any single prior SPI experiment, using the new capabilities of the European X-ray free electron laser which allow measurements of 1500 frames per second. A classification and structural sorting method was developed to disentangle the heterogeneity of the particles and to obtain a resolution of better than 3 nm. With these new experimental and analytical developments, we have entered a new era for the SPI method and the path towards close-to-atomic resolution imaging of biomolecules is apparent.

preprint2014arXiv

Effect of dynamical interactions on integrated properties of globular clusters

Globular Clusters (GCs) are generally treated as natural validators of simple stellar population (SSP) models. However, there are still some differences between real GCs and SSPs. In this work we use a direct NN-body simulation code {\hf Nbody6} to study the influences of dynamical interactions, metallicity and primordial binaries on Milky Way globular clusters' integrated properties. Our models start with N=100,000N=100,000 stars, covering a metallicity range Z=0.0001−0.02Z=0.0001-0.02, a subset of our models contain primordial binaries, resulting in a binary fraction as currently observed at a model age of GCs.Stellar evolution and external tidal field representative for an average Milky Way GC are taken into consideration. The integrated colours and Lick indices are calculated using BaSeL and Bluered stellar spectral libraries separately. By including dynamical interactions, our model clusters show integrated features (colours up to 0.01mag bluer, Hββ up to 0.1Å greater and [MgFe]′' 0.05Å smaller) making the clusters appear slightly younger than the model clusters without dynamical interactions. This effect is caused mainly by the preferential loss of low-mass stars which have a stronger contribution to redder passbands as well as different spectral features compared to higher-mass stars. In addition, this effect is larger at lower metallicities. On the contrary, the incorporation of primordial binaries reduces this effect.

preprint2013arXiv

Uncertainties in the calibrations of star formation rate

The calibrations of star formation rate (SFR) are prone to be affected by many factors, such as metallicity, initial mass function (IMF), evolutionary population synthesis (EPS) models and so on. In this paper we will discuss the effects of binary interactions, metallicity, EPS models and IMF on several widely used SFR calibrations based on the EPS models of Yunnan with and without binary interactions, BC03, SB99, PEGASE and POPSTAR. The inclusion of binary interactions makes these SFR conversion coefficients smaller (less than 0.2dex), and these differences increase with metallicity. The differences in the calibration coefficient between SFR and the luminosity of Hα\rm Hα recombination line (CHα_{\rm Hα}) and that between SFR and the ultraviolet (UV) fluxes at 1500 and 2800\,A˚\rm Å (Ci,UV_{i, {\rm UV}}), caused by IMF, are independent of metallicity (0.03-0.33\,dex) except ΔΔCHα,IMF_{\rm Hα, IMF} when using the POPSTAR and ΔΔCi,UV,IMF_{i, {\rm UV, IMF}} when using the PEGASE models. Moreover, we find that L2800L_{\rm 2800} is not suitable to the linear calibration of SFR at low metallicities. At last, we compare the effects of these several factors on the SFR calibrations considered in this paper. The effects of metallicity/IMF and EPS models on the CHα_{\rm Hα} and CFIR_{\rm FIR} (the conversion coefficient between SFR and the far-infrared flux) are the largest among these factors, respectively. For the calibration between SFR and Ci,UV_{i, {\rm UV}}, the effects of these several factors are comparable.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.