BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yuehan Yang

Yuehan Yang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyComputationmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A sequential stepwise screening procedure for sparse recovery in high-dimensional multiresponse models with complex group structures

Multiresponse data with complex group structures in both responses and predictors arises in many fields, yet, due to the difficulty in identifying complex group structures, only a few methods have been studied on this problem. We propose a novel algorithm called sequential stepwise screening procedure (SeSS) for feature selection in high-dimensional multiresponse models with complex group structures. This algorithm encourages the grouping effect, where responses and predictors come from different groups, further, each response group is allowed to relate to multiple predictor groups. To obtain a correct model under the complex group structures, the proposed procedure first chooses the nonzero block and the nonzero row by the canonical correlation measure (CC) and then selects the nonzero entries by the extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC). We show that this method is accurate in extremely sparse models and computationally attractive. The theoretical property of SeSS is established. We conduct simulation studies and consider a real example to compare its performances with existing methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Randomization-based joint central limit theorem and efficient covariate adjustment in stratified $2^K$ factorial experiments

Randomized block factorial experiments are widely used in industrial engineering, clinical trials, and social science. Researchers often use a linear model and analysis of covariance to analyze experimental results; however, limited studies have addressed the validity and robustness of the resulting inferences because assumptions for a linear model might not be justified by randomization in randomized block factorial experiments. In this paper, we establish a new finite population joint central limit theorem for usual (unadjusted) factorial effect estimators in randomized block $2^K$ factorial experiments. Our theorem is obtained under a randomization-based inference framework, making use of an extension of the vector form of the Wald--Wolfowitz--Hoeffding theorem for a linear rank statistic. It is robust to model misspecification, numbers of blocks, block sizes, and propensity scores across blocks. To improve the estimation and inference efficiency, we propose four covariate adjustment methods. We show that under mild conditions, the resulting covariate-adjusted factorial effect estimators are consistent, jointly asymptotically normal, and generally more efficient than the unadjusted estimator. In addition, we propose Neyman-type conservative estimators for the asymptotic covariances to facilitate valid inferences. Simulation studies and a clinical trial data analysis demonstrate the benefits of the covariate adjustment methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Interaction Pursuit Biconvex Optimization

Multivariate regression models are widely used in various fields such as biology and finance. In this paper, we focus on two key challenges: (a) When should we favor a multivariate model over a series of univariate models; (b) If the numbers of responses and predictors are allowed to greatly exceed the sample size, how to reduce the computational cost and provide precise estimation. The proposed method, Interaction Pursuit Biconvex Optimization (IPBO), explores the regression relationship allowing the predictors and responses derived from different multivariate normal distributions with general covariance matrices. In practice, the correlation structures within are complex and interact on each other based on the regression function. The proposed method solves this problem by building a structured sparsity penalty to encourages the shared structure between the network and the regression coefficients. We prove theoretical results under interpretable conditions, and provide an efficient algorithm to compute the estimator. Simulation studies and real data examples compare the proposed method with several existing methods, indicating that IPBO works well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Regression-adjusted average treatment effect estimates in stratified randomized experiments

Researchers often use linear regression to analyse randomized experiments to improve treatment effect estimation by adjusting for imbalances of covariates in the treatment and control groups. Our work offers a randomization-based inference framework for regression adjustment in stratified randomized experiments. Under mild conditions, we re-establish the finite population central limit theorem for a stratified experiment. We prove that both the stratified difference-in-means and the regression-adjusted average treatment effect estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. The asymptotic variance of the latter is no greater and is typically lesser than that of the former. We also provide conservative variance estimators to construct large-sample confidence intervals for the average treatment effect.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access