BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Youngjo Lee contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
Fisher's fiducial probability has recently received renewed attention under the name confidence. In this paper, we reformulate it within an extended-likelihood framework, a representation that helps to resolve many long-standing controversies. The proposed formulation accommodates multi-dimensional parameters and shows how higher-order approximations can be used to refine standard asymptotic confidence statements.
We study the chirality of staggered quarks on the Dirac eigenvalue spectrum using deep learning (DL) techniques. The Kluberg-Stern method to construct staggered bilinear operators conserves continuum property such as recursion relations, uniqueness of chirality, and Ward identities, which leads to a unique and characteristic pattern (we call it "leakage pattern (LP)") in the matrix elements of the chirality operator sandwiched between two quark eigenstates of staggered Dirac operator. DL analysis gives $99.4(2)\%$ accuracy on normal gauge configurations and $0.998$ AUC (Area Under ROC Curve) for classifying non-zero mode octets in the Dirac eigenvalue spectrum. It confirms that the leakage pattern is universal on normal gauge configurations. The multi-layer perceptron (MLP) method turns out to be the best DL model for our study on the LP.
The Laplace approximation (LA) has been proposed as a method for approximating the marginal likelihood of statistical models with latent variables. However, the approximate maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) based on the LA are often biased for binary or spatial data, and the corresponding Hessian matrix underestimates the standard errors of these approximate MLEs. A higher-order approximation has been proposed; however, it cannot be applied to complicated models such as correlated random effects models and does not provide consistent variance estimators. In this paper, we propose an enhanced LA (ELA) that provides the true MLE and its consistent variance estimator. We study its relationship to the variational Bayes method. We also introduce a new restricted maximum likelihood estimator (REMLE) for estimating dispersion parameters. The results of numerical studies show that the ELA provides a satisfactory MLE and REMLE, as well as their variance estimators for fixed parameters. The MLE and REMLE can be viewed as posterior mode and marginal posterior mode under flat priors, respectively. Some comparisons are also made with Bayesian procedures under different priors.
Maximum likelihood (ML) estimation is widely used in statistics. The h-likelihood has been proposed as an extension of Fisher's likelihood to statistical models including unobserved latent variables of recent interest. Its advantage is that the joint maximization gives ML estimators (MLEs) of both fixed and random parameters with their standard error estimates. However, the current h-likelihood approach does not allow MLEs of variance components as Henderson's joint likelihood does not in linear mixed models. In this paper, we show how to form the h-likelihood in order to facilitate joint maximization for MLEs of whole parameters. We also show the role of the Jacobian term which allows MLEs in the presence of unobserved latent variables. To obtain MLEs for fixed parameters, intractable integration is not necessary. As an illustration, we show one-shot ML imputation for missing data by treating them as realized but unobserved random parameters. We show that the h-likelihood bypasses the expectation step in the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and allows single ML imputation instead of multiple imputations. We also discuss the difference in predictions in random effects and missing data.
There have been controversies among statisticians on (i) what to model and (ii) how to make inferences from models with unobservables. One such controversy concerns the difference between estimation methods for the marginal means not necessarily having a probabilistic basis and statistical models having unobservables with a probabilistic basis. Another concerns likelihood-based inference for statistical models with unobservables. This needs an extended-likelihood framework, and we show how one such extension, hierarchical likelihood, allows this to be done. Modeling of unobservables leads to rich classes of new probabilistic models from which likelihood-type inferences can be made naturally with hierarchical likelihood.
Rejoinder to "Likelihood Inference for Models with Unobservables: Another View" by Youngjo Lee and John A. Nelder [arXiv:1010.0303]