BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yinghua Hu

Yinghua Hu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cryptography and Securityeess.SYSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

TriLock: IC Protection with Tunable Corruptibility and Resilience to SAT and Removal Attacks

Sequential logic locking has been studied over the last decade as a method to protect sequential circuits from reverse engineering. However, most of the existing sequential logic locking techniques are threatened by increasingly more sophisticated SAT-based attacks, efficiently using input queries to a SAT solver to rule out incorrect keys, as well as removal attacks based on structural analysis. In this paper, we propose TriLock, a sequential logic locking method that simultaneously addresses these vulnerabilities. TriLock can achieve high, tunable functional corruptibility while still guaranteeing exponential queries to the SAT solver in a SAT-based attack. Further, it adopts a state re-encoding method to obscure the boundary between the original state registers and those inserted by the locking method, thus making it more difficult to detect and remove the locking-related components.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Fun-SAT: Functional Corruptibility-Guided SAT-Based Attack on Sequential Logic Encryption

The SAT attack has shown to be efficient against most combinational logic encryption methods. It can be extended to attack sequential logic encryption techniques by leveraging circuit unrolling and model checking methods. However, with no guidance on the number of times that a circuit needs to be unrolled to find the correct key, the attack tends to solve many time-consuming Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and model checking problems, which can significantly hamper its efficiency. In this paper, we introduce Fun-SAT, a functional corruptibility-guided SAT-based attack that can significantly decrease the SAT solving and model checking time of a SAT-based attack on sequential encryption by efficiently estimating the minimum required number of circuit unrollings. Fun-SAT relies on a notion of functional corruptibility for encrypted sequential circuits and its relationship with the required number of circuit unrollings in a SAT-based attack. Numerical results show that Fun-SAT can be, on average, 90x faster than previous attacks against state-of-the-art encryption methods, when both attacks successfully complete before a one-day time-out. Moreover, Fun-SAT completes before the time-out on many more circuits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

SANSCrypt: A Sporadic-Authentication-Based Sequential Logic Encryption Scheme

We propose SANSCrypt, a novel sequential logic encryption scheme to protect integrated circuits against reverse engineering. Previous sequential encryption methods focus on modifying the circuit state machine such that the correct functionality can be accessed by applying the correct key sequence only once. Considering the risk associated with one-time authentication, SANSCrypt adopts a new temporal dimension to logic encryption, by requiring the user to sporadically perform multiple authentications according to a protocol based on pseudo-random number generation. Analysis and validation results on a set of benchmark circuits show that SANSCrypt offers a substantial output corruptibility if the key sequences are applied incorrectly. Moreover, it exhibits an exponential resilience to existing attacks, including SAT-based attacks, while maintaining a reasonably low overhead.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Toward Efficient Evaluation of Logic Encryption Schemes: Models and Metrics

Research in logic encryption over the last decade has resulted in various techniques to prevent different security threats such as Trojan insertion, intellectual property leakage, and reverse engineering. However, there is little agreement on a uniform set of metrics and models to efficiently assess the achieved security level and the trade-offs between security and overhead. This paper addresses the above challenges by relying on a general logic encryption model that can encompass all the existing techniques, and a uniform set of metrics that can capture multiple, possibly conflicting, security concerns. We apply our modeling approach to four state-of-the-art encryption techniques, showing that it enables fast and accurate evaluation of design trade-offs, average prediction errors that are at least 2X smaller than previous approaches, and the evaluation of compound encryption methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access