BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yilan Chen

Yilan Chen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningComputer VisionArtificial Intelligencemath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Demystify Optimization and Generalization of Over-parameterized PAC-Bayesian Learning

PAC-Bayesian is an analysis framework where the training error can be expressed as the weighted average of the hypotheses in the posterior distribution whilst incorporating the prior knowledge. In addition to being a pure generalization bound analysis tool, PAC-Bayesian bound can also be incorporated into an objective function to train a probabilistic neural network, making them a powerful and relevant framework that can numerically provide a tight generalization bound for supervised learning. For simplicity, we call probabilistic neural network learned using training objectives derived from PAC-Bayesian bounds as {\it PAC-Bayesian learning}. Despite their empirical success, the theoretical analysis of PAC-Bayesian learning for neural networks is rarely explored. This paper proposes a new class of convergence and generalization analysis for PAC-Bayes learning when it is used to train the over-parameterized neural networks by the gradient descent method. For a wide probabilistic neural network, we show that when PAC-Bayes learning is applied, the convergence result corresponds to solving a kernel ridge regression when the probabilistic neural tangent kernel (PNTK) is used as its kernel. Based on this finding, we further characterize the uniform PAC-Bayesian generalization bound which improves over the Rademacher complexity-based bound for non-probabilistic neural network. Finally, drawing the insight from our theoretical results, we propose a proxy measure for efficient hyperparameters selection, which is proven to be time-saving.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Equivalence between Neural Network and Support Vector Machine

Recent research shows that the dynamics of an infinitely wide neural network (NN) trained by gradient descent can be characterized by Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) \citep{jacot2018neural}. Under the squared loss, the infinite-width NN trained by gradient descent with an infinitely small learning rate is equivalent to kernel regression with NTK \citep{arora2019exact}. However, the equivalence is only known for ridge regression currently \citep{arora2019harnessing}, while the equivalence between NN and other kernel machines (KMs), e.g. support vector machine (SVM), remains unknown. Therefore, in this work, we propose to establish the equivalence between NN and SVM, and specifically, the infinitely wide NN trained by soft margin loss and the standard soft margin SVM with NTK trained by subgradient descent. Our main theoretical results include establishing the equivalences between NNs and a broad family of $\ell_2$ regularized KMs with finite-width bounds, which cannot be handled by prior work, and showing that every finite-width NN trained by such regularized loss functions is approximately a KM. Furthermore, we demonstrate our theory can enable three practical applications, including (i) \textit{non-vacuous} generalization bound of NN via the corresponding KM; (ii) \textit{non-trivial} robustness certificate for the infinite-width NN (while existing robustness verification methods would provide vacuous bounds); (iii) intrinsically more robust infinite-width NNs than those from previous kernel regression. Our code for the experiments is available at \url{https://github.com/leslie-CH/equiv-nn-svm}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Quantifying the Knowledge in a DNN to Explain Knowledge Distillation for Classification

Compared to traditional learning from scratch, knowledge distillation sometimes makes the DNN achieve superior performance. This paper provides a new perspective to explain the success of knowledge distillation, i.e., quantifying knowledge points encoded in intermediate layers of a DNN for classification, based on the information theory. To this end, we consider the signal processing in a DNN as the layer-wise information discarding. A knowledge point is referred to as an input unit, whose information is much less discarded than other input units. Thus, we propose three hypotheses for knowledge distillation based on the quantification of knowledge points. 1. The DNN learning from knowledge distillation encodes more knowledge points than the DNN learning from scratch. 2. Knowledge distillation makes the DNN more likely to learn different knowledge points simultaneously. In comparison, the DNN learning from scratch tends to encode various knowledge points sequentially. 3. The DNN learning from knowledge distillation is often optimized more stably than the DNN learning from scratch. In order to verify the above hypotheses, we design three types of metrics with annotations of foreground objects to analyze feature representations of the DNN, \textit{i.e.} the quantity and the quality of knowledge points, the learning speed of different knowledge points, and the stability of optimization directions. In experiments, we diagnosed various DNNs for different classification tasks, i.e., image classification, 3D point cloud classification, binary sentiment classification, and question answering, which verified above hypotheses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Explaining Knowledge Distillation by Quantifying the Knowledge

This paper presents a method to interpret the success of knowledge distillation by quantifying and analyzing task-relevant and task-irrelevant visual concepts that are encoded in intermediate layers of a deep neural network (DNN). More specifically, three hypotheses are proposed as follows. 1. Knowledge distillation makes the DNN learn more visual concepts than learning from raw data. 2. Knowledge distillation ensures that the DNN is prone to learning various visual concepts simultaneously. Whereas, in the scenario of learning from raw data, the DNN learns visual concepts sequentially. 3. Knowledge distillation yields more stable optimization directions than learning from raw data. Accordingly, we design three types of mathematical metrics to evaluate feature representations of the DNN. In experiments, we diagnosed various DNNs, and above hypotheses were verified.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access