Researcher profile

Yijie Xu

Yijie Xu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Action-Sketcher: From Reasoning to Action via Visual Sketches for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation

Long-horizon robotic manipulation is increasingly important for real-world deployment, requiring spatial disambiguation in complex layouts and temporal resilience under dynamic interaction. However, existing end-to-end and hierarchical Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies often rely on text-only cues while keeping plan intent latent, which undermines referential grounding in cluttered or underspecified scenes, impedes effective task decomposition of long-horizon goals with close-loop interaction, and limits causal explanation by obscuring the rationale behind action choices. To address these issues, we first introduce Visual Sketch, an implausible visual intermediate that renders points, boxes, arrows, and typed relations in the robot's current views to externalize spatial intent, connect language to scene geometry. Building on Visual Sketch, we present Action-Sketcher, a VLA framework that operates in a cyclic See-Think-Sketch-Act workflow coordinated by adaptive token-gated strategy for reasoning triggers, sketch revision, and action issuance, thereby supporting reactive corrections and human interaction while preserving real-time action prediction. To enable scalable training and evaluation, we curate diverse corpus with interleaved images, text, Visual Sketch supervision, and action sequences, and train Action-Sketcher with a multi-stage curriculum recipe that combines interleaved sequence alignment for modality unification, language-to-sketch consistency for precise linguistic grounding, and imitation learning augmented with sketch-to-action reinforcement for robustness. Extensive experiments on cluttered scenes and multi-object tasks, in simulation and on real-world tasks, show improved long-horizon success, stronger robustness to dynamic scene changes, and enhanced interpretability via editable sketches and step-wise plans. Project website: https://action-sketcher.github.io

preprint2022arXiv

Research on Interpolation and Data Fitting: Basis and Applications

In the era of big data, we first need to manage the data, which requires us to find missing data or predict the trend, so we need operations including interpolation and data fitting. Interpolation is a process to discover deducing new data points in a range through known and discrete data points. When solving scientific and engineering problems, data points are usually obtained by sampling, experiments, and other methods. These data may represent a finite number of numerical functions in which the values of independent variables. According to these data, we often want to get a continuous function, i.e., curve; or more dense discrete equations are consistent with known data, while this process is called fitting. This article describes why the main idea come out logically and how to apply various method since the definitions are already written in the textbooks. At the same time, we give examples to help introduce the definitions or show the applications. We divide interpolation into several parts by their methods or functions for the structure. What comes first is the polynomial interpolation, which contains Lagrange interpolation and Newton interpolation, which are essential but critical. Then we introduce a typical stepwise linear interpolation - Neville's algorithm. If we are concerned about the derivative, it comes to Hermite interpolation; if we focus on smoothness, it comes to cubic splines and Chebyshev nodes. Finally, in the Data fitting part, we introduce the most typical one: the Linear squares method, which needs to be completed by normal equations.

preprint2020arXiv

Machine-learning assisted cross-domain prediction of ionic conductivity in sodium and lithium-based superionic conductors

Solid state lithium- and sodium-ion batteries utilize solid ionicly conducting compounds as electrolytes. However, the ionic conductivity of such materials tends to be lower than their liquid counterparts, necessitating research efforts into finding suitable alternatives. The process of electrolyte screening is often based on a mixture of domain expertise and trial-and-error, both of which are time and resource-intensive. Data-driven and machine learning approaches have recently come to the fore to accelerate learnings towards discovery. In this work, we present a simple machine-learning based approach to predict the ionic conductivity of sodium and lithium-based SICON compounds. Using primarily theoretical elemental feature descriptors derivable from tabulated information on the unit cell and the atomic properties of the components of a target compound on a limited dataset of 70 NASICON-examples, we have designed a logistic regression-based model capable of distinguishing between poor and good superionic conductors with a cross-validation accuracy of over 82%. Moreover, we demonstrate how such a system is capable of cross-domain classification on lithium-based examples at the same accuracy, despite being introduced to zero lithium-based compounds during training. Through a systematic permutation-based evaluation process, we reduced the number of considered features from 47 to 7, reduction of over 83%, while simultaneously improving model performance. The contributions of different electronic and structural features to overall ionic conductivity is also discussed, and contrasted with accepted theories in literature. Our results demonstrate the utility of such a simple, yet interpretable tool provides opportunities for initial screening of potential candidates as solid-state electrolytes through the use of existing data.