Researcher profile

Yasin Yazici

Yasin Yazici contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Revisiting Pretraining for Semi-Supervised Learning in the Low-Label Regime

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) addresses the lack of labeled data by exploiting large unlabeled data through pseudolabeling. However, in the extremely low-label regime, pseudo labels could be incorrect, a.k.a. the confirmation bias, and the pseudo labels will in turn harm the network training. Recent studies combined finetuning (FT) from pretrained weights with SSL to mitigate the challenges and claimed superior results in the low-label regime. In this work, we first show that the better pretrained weights brought in by FT account for the state-of-the-art performance, and importantly that they are universally helpful to off-the-shelf semi-supervised learners. We further argue that direct finetuning from pretrained weights is suboptimal due to covariate shift and propose a contrastive target pretraining step to adapt model weights towards target dataset. We carried out extensive experiments on both classification and segmentation tasks by doing target pretraining then followed by semi-supervised finetuning. The promising results validate the efficacy of target pretraining for SSL, in particular in the low-label regime.

preprint2022arXiv

SemiCurv: Semi-Supervised Curvilinear Structure Segmentation

Recent work on curvilinear structure segmentation has mostly focused on backbone network design and loss engineering. The challenge of collecting labelled data, an expensive and labor intensive process, has been overlooked. While labelled data is expensive to obtain, unlabelled data is often readily available. In this work, we propose SemiCurv, a semi-supervised learning (SSL) framework for curvilinear structure segmentation that is able to utilize such unlabelled data to reduce the labelling burden. Our framework addresses two key challenges in formulating curvilinear segmentation in a semi-supervised manner. First, to fully exploit the power of consistency based SSL, we introduce a geometric transformation as strong data augmentation and then align segmentation predictions via a differentiable inverse transformation to enable the computation of pixel-wise consistency. Second, the traditional mean square error (MSE) on unlabelled data is prone to collapsed predictions and this issue exacerbates with severe class imbalance (significantly more background pixels). We propose a N-pair consistency loss to avoid trivial predictions on unlabelled data. We evaluate SemiCurv on six curvilinear segmentation datasets, and find that with no more than 5% of the labelled data, it achieves close to 95% of the performance relative to its fully supervised counterpart.

preprint2020arXiv

Empirical Analysis of Overfitting and Mode Drop in GAN Training

We examine two key questions in GAN training, namely overfitting and mode drop, from an empirical perspective. We show that when stochasticity is removed from the training procedure, GANs can overfit and exhibit almost no mode drop. Our results shed light on important characteristics of the GAN training procedure. They also provide evidence against prevailing intuitions that GANs do not memorize the training set, and that mode dropping is mainly due to properties of the GAN objective rather than how it is optimized during training.