Researcher profile

Yanjing Wang

Yanjing Wang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Cohet: A CXL-Driven Coherent Heterogeneous Computing Framework with Hardware-Calibrated Full-System Simulation

Conventional heterogeneous computing systems built on PCIe interconnects suffer from inefficient fine-grained host-device interactions and complex programming models. In recent years, many proprietary and open cache-coherent interconnect standards have emerged, among which compute express link (CXL) prevails in the open-standard domain after acquiring several competing solutions. Although CXL-based coherent heterogeneous computing holds the potential to fundamentally transform the collaborative computing mode of CPUs and XPUs, research in this direction remains hampered by the scarcity of available CXL-supported platforms, immature software/hardware ecosystems, and unclear application prospects. This paper presents Cohet, the first CXL-driven coherent heterogeneous computing framework. Cohet decouples the compute and memory resources to form unbiased CPU and XPU pools which share a single unified and coherent memory pool. It exposes a standard malloc/mmap interface to both CPU and XPU compute threads, leaving the OS dealing with smart memory allocation and management of heterogeneous resources. To facilitate Cohet research, we also present a full-system cycle-level simulator named SimCXL, which is capable of modeling all CXL sub-protocols and device types. SimCXL has been rigorously calibrated against a real CXL testbed with various CXL memory and accelerators, showing an average simulation error of 3%. Our evaluation reveals that CXL.cache reduces latency by 68% and increases bandwidth by 14.4x compared to DMA transfers at cacheline granularity. Building upon these insights, we demonstrate the benefits of Cohet with two killer apps, which are remote atomic operation (RAO) and remote procedure call (RPC). Compared to PCIe-NIC design, CXL-NIC achieves a 5.5 to 40.2x speedup for RAO offloading and an average speedup of 1.86x for RPC (de)serialization offloading.

preprint2026arXiv

CXL-DMSim: A Full-System CXL Disaggregated Memory Simulator With Comprehensive Silicon Validation

Compute eXpress Link (CXL) has emerged as a key enabler of memory disaggregation for future heterogeneous computing systems to expand memory on-demand and improve resource utilization. However, CXL is still in its infancy stage and lacks commodity products on the market, thus necessitating a reliable system-level simulation tool for research and development. In this paper, we propose CXL-DMSim, an open-source full-system simulator to simulate CXL disaggregated memory systems with high fidelity at a gem5-comparable simulation speed. CXL-DMSim incorporates a flexible CXL memory expander model along with its associated device driver, and CXL protocol support with CXL.io and CXL.mem. It can operate in both app-managed mode and kernel-managed mode, with the latter using a dedicated NUMA-compatible mechanism. The simulator has been rigorously verified against a real hardware testbed with both FPGAand ASIC-based CXL memory devices, which demonstrates the qualification of CXL-DMSim in simulating the characteristics of various CXL memory devices at an average simulation error of 3.4%. The experimental results using LMbench and STREAM benchmarks suggest that the CXL-FPGA memory exhibits a ~2.88x higher latency than local DDR while the CXL-ASIC latency is ~2.18x; CXL-FPGA achieves 45-69% of local DDR memory bandwidth, whereas the number for CXLASIC is 82-83%. The study also reveals that CXL memory can significantly enhance the performance of memory-intensive applications, improved by 23x at most with limited local memory for Viper key-value database and approximately 60% in memorybandwidth-sensitive scenarios such as MERCI. Moreover, the simulator's observability and expandability are showcased with detailed case-studies, highlighting its great potential for research on future CXL-interconnected hybrid memory pool.

preprint2022arXiv

An Epistemic Interpretation of Tensor Disjunction

This paper aims to give an epistemic interpretation to the tensor disjunction in dependence logic, through a rather surprising connection to the so-called weak disjunction in Medvedev's early work on intermediate logic under the Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov (BHK)-interpretation. We expose this connection in the setting of inquisitive logic with tensor disjunction discussed by Ciardelli and Barbero (2019}, but from an epistemic perspective. More specifically, we translate the propositional formulae of inquisitive logic with tensor into modal formulae in a powerful epistemic language of "knowing how" following the proposal by Wang (2021). We give a complete axiomatization of the logic of our full language based on Fine's axiomatization of S5 modal logic with propositional quantifiers. Finally, we generalize the tensor operator with parameters $k$ and $n$, which intuitively captures the epistemic situation that one knows $n$ potential answers to $n$ questions and is sure $k$ answers of them must be correct. The original tensor disjunction is the special case when $k=1$ and $n=2$. We show that the generalized tensor operators do not increase the expressive power of our logic, the inquisitive logic, and propositional dependence logic, though most of these generalized tensors are not uniformly definable in these logics, except in our dynamic epistemic logic of knowing how.

preprint2022arXiv

Are Bundles Good Deals for FOML?

Bundled products are often offered as good deals to customers. When we bundle quantifiers and modalities together (as in $\exists x \Box$, $\Diamond \forall x$ etc.) in first-order modal logic (FOML), we get new logical operators whose combinations produce interesting fragments of FOML without any restriction on the arity of predicates, the number of variables, or the modal scope. It is well-known that finding decidable fragments of FOML is hard, so we may ask: do bundled fragments that exploit the distinct expressivity of FOML constitute good deals in balancing the expressivity and complexity? There are a few positive earlier results on some particular fragments. In this paper, we try to fully map the terrain of bundled fragments of FOML in (un)decidability, and in the cases without a definite answer yet, we show that they lack the finite model property. Moreover, whether the logics are interpreted over constant domains (across states/worlds) or increasing domains presents another layer of complexity. We also present the \textit{loosely bundled fragment}, which generalizes the bundles and yet retain decidability (over increasing domain models).

preprint2022arXiv

Inquisitive Logic as an Epistemic Logic of Knowing How

In this paper, we present an alternative interpretation of propositional inquisitive logic as an epistemic logic of knowing how. In our setting, an inquisitive logic formula $α$ being supported by a state is formalized as "knowing how to resolve $α$" (more colloquially, "knowing how $α$ is true") holds on the S5 epistemic model corresponding to the state. Based on this epistemic interpretation, we use a dynamic epistemic logic with both know-how and know-that operators to capture the epistemic information behind the innocent-looking connectives in inquisitive logic. We show that the set of valid know-how formulas corresponds precisely to the inquisitive logic. The main result is a complete axiomatization with intuitive axioms using the full dynamic epistemic language. Moreover, we show that the know-how operator and the dynamic operator can both be eliminated without changing the expressivity over models, which is consistent with the modal translation of inquisitive logic existing in the literature. We hope our framework can give an intuitive alternative interpretation of various concepts and technical results in inquisitive logic, and also provide a powerful and flexible tool to do inquisitive reasoning in an epistemic context.