Source author record

Yadu Vasudev

Yadu Vasudev appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computational Complexity Data Structures and Algorithms Discrete Mathematics Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Dynamic Complexity of Expansion

Dynamic Complexity was introduced by Immerman and Patnaik \cite{PatnaikImmerman97} (see also \cite{DongST95}). It has seen a resurgence of interest in the recent past, see \cite{DattaHK14,ZeumeS15,MunozVZ16,BouyerJ17,Zeume17,DKMSZ18,DMVZ18,BarceloRZ18,DMSVZ19,SchmidtSVZK20,DKMTVZ20} for some representative examples. Use of linear algebra has been a notable feature of some of these papers. We extend this theme to show that the gap version of spectral expansion in bounded degree graphs can be maintained in the class $\DynACz$ (also known as $\dynfo$, for domain independent queries) under batch changes (insertions and deletions) of $O(\frac{\log{n}}{\log{\log{n}}})$ many edges. The spectral graph theoretic material of this work is based on the paper by Kale-Seshadri \cite{KaleS11}. Our primary technical contribution is to maintain up to logarithmic powers of the transition matrix of a bounded degree undirected graph in $\DynACz$.

preprint2016arXiv

Fast Distributed Algorithms for Testing Graph Properties

We initiate a thorough study of \emph{distributed property testing} -- producing algorithms for the approximation problems of property testing in the CONGEST model. In particular, for the so-called \emph{dense} testing model we emulate sequential tests for nearly all graph properties having $1$-sided tests, while in the \emph{sparse} and \emph{general} models we obtain faster tests for triangle-freeness and bipartiteness respectively. In most cases, aided by parallelism, the distributed algorithms have a much shorter running time as compared to their counterparts from the sequential querying model of traditional property testing. The simplest property testing algorithms allow a relatively smooth transitioning to the distributed model. For the more complex tasks we develop new machinery that is of independent interest. This includes a method for distributed maintenance of multiple random walks.

preprint2016arXiv

Improving and extending the testing of distributions for shape-restricted properties

Distribution testing deals with what information can be deduced about an unknown distribution over $\{1,\ldots,n\}$, where the algorithm is only allowed to obtain a relatively small number of independent samples from the distribution. In the extended conditional sampling model, the algorithm is also allowed to obtain samples from the restriction of the original distribution on subsets of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$. In 2015, Canonne, Diakonikolas, Gouleakis and Rubinfeld unified several previous results, and showed that for any property of distributions satisfying a "decomposability" criterion, there exists an algorithm (in the basic model) that can distinguish with high probability distributions satisfying the property from distributions that are far from it in the variation distance. We present here a more efficient yet simpler algorithm for the basic model, as well as very efficient algorithms for the conditional model, which until now was not investigated under the umbrella of decomposable properties. Additionally, we provide an algorithm for the conditional model that handles a much larger class of properties. Our core mechanism is a way of efficiently producing an interval-partition of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$ that satisfies a "fine-grain" quality. We show that with such a partition at hand we can directly move forward with testing individual intervals, instead of first searching for the "correct" partition of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$.

preprint2015arXiv

Trading query complexity for sample-based testing and multi-testing scalability

We show here that every non-adaptive property testing algorithm making a constant number of queries, over a fixed alphabet, can be converted to a sample-based (as per [Goldreich and Ron, 2015]) testing algorithm whose average number of queries is a fixed, smaller than $1$, power of $n$. Since the query distribution of the sample-based algorithm is not dependent at all on the property, or the original algorithm, this has many implications in scenarios where there are many properties that need to be tested for concurrently, such as testing (relatively large) unions of properties, or converting a Merlin-Arthur Proximity proof (as per [Gur and Rothblum, 2013]) to a proper testing algorithm. The proof method involves preparing the original testing algorithm for a combinatorial analysis, which in turn involves a new result about the existence of combinatorial structures (essentially generalized sunflowers) that allow the sample-based tester to replace the original constant query complexity tester.

preprint2012arXiv

Near-Optimal Expanding Generating Sets for Solvable Permutation Groups

Let $G =<S>$ be a solvable permutation group of the symmetric group $S_n$ given as input by the generating set $S$. We give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that computes an \emph{expanding generating set} of size $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ for $G$. More precisely, the algorithm computes a subset $T\subset G$ of size $\tilde{O}(n^2)(1/λ)^{O(1)}$ such that the undirected Cayley graph $Cay(G,T)$ is a $λ$-spectral expander (the $\tilde{O}$ notation suppresses $\log ^{O(1)}n$ factors). As a byproduct of our proof, we get a new explicit construction of $\varepsilon$-bias spaces of size $\tilde{O}(n\poly(\log d))(\frac{1}{\varepsilon})^{O(1)}$ for the groups $\Z_d^n$. The earlier known size bound was $O((d+n/\varepsilon^2))^{11/2}$ given by \cite{AMN98}.