BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Xuandong Li

Xuandong Li contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Formal Verification of `Programming to Interfaces' Programs

This paper presents a formal approach to specify and verify object-oriented programs written in the `programming to interfaces' paradigm. Besides the methods to be invoked by its clients, an interface also declares a set of abstract function/predicate symbols, together with a set of constraints on these symbols. For each method declared in this interface, a specification template is given using these abstract symbols. A class implementing this interface can give its own definitions to the abstract symbols, as long as all the constraints are satisfied. This class implements all the methods declared in the interface such that the method specification templates declared in the interface are satisfied w.r.t. the definitions of the abstract function symbols in this class. Based on the constraints on the abstract symbols, the client code using interfaces can be specified and verified precisely without knowing what classes implement these interfaces. Given more information about the implementing classes, the specifications of the client code can be specialized into more precise ones without re-verifying the client code. Several commonly used interfaces and their implementations (including Iterator, Observer, Comparable, and Comparator) are used to demonstrate that the approach in this paper is both precise and flexible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Online Verification of Control Parameter Calculations in Communication Based Train Control System

Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) system is the state-of-the-art train control system. In a CBTC system, to guarantee the safety of train operation, trains communicate with each other intensively and adjust their control modes autonomously by computing critical control parameters, e.g. velocity range, according to the information they get. As the correctness of the control parameters generated are critical to the safety of the system, a method to verify these parameters is a strong desire in the area of train control system. In this paper, we present our ideas of how to model and verify the control parameter calculations in a CBTC system efficiently. - As the behavior of the system is highly nondeterministic, it is difficult to build and verify the complete behavior space model of the system online in advance. Thus, we propose to model the system according to the ongoing behavior model induced by the control parameters. - As the parameters are generated online and updated very quickly, the verification result will be meaningless if it is given beyond the time bound, since by that time the model will be changed already. Thus, we propose a method to verify the existence of certain dangerous scenarios in the model online quickly. To demonstrate the feasibility of these proposed approaches, we present the composed linear hybrid automata with readable shared variables as a modeling language to model the control parameters calculation and give a path-oriented reachability analysis technique for the scenario-based verification of this model. We demonstrate the model built for the CBTC system, and show the performance of our technique in fast online verification. Last but not least, as CBTC system is a typical CPS system, we also give a short discussion of the potential directions for CPS verification in this paper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Scope Logic with Local Reasoning and Pre/Post-State Properties

This paper presents an extension to Hoare logic for pointer program verification. Logic formulas with user-defined recursive functions are used to specify properties on the program states before/after program executions. Three basic functions are introduced to represents memory access, record-field access and array-element access. Some axioms are introduced to specify these basic functions in our logic. The concept Memory Scope Function (MSF) is introduced in our logic. Given a recursive function $f$, the MSF of $f$ computes the set of memory units accessed during the evaluation of $f$. A set of rules are given to derive the definition of this MSF syntactically from the definition of $f$. As MSFs are also recursive functions, they also have their MSFs. An axiom is given to specify that an MSF contains its MSF. Based on this axiom, local reasoning is supported with predicate variables. Pre-state terms are used to specify the relations between pre-states and post-states. People can use pre-state terms in post-conditions to represents the values on the pre-state. The axiom of assignment statements in Hoare's logic is modified to deal with pointers. The basic idea is that during the program execution, a recursive function is evaluated to the same value as long as no memory unit in its memory scope is modified. Another proof rule is added for memory allocation statements. We use a simple example to show that our logic can deal with pointer programs in this paper. In the appendix, the Shorre-Waite algorithm is proved using our logic. We also use the selection-sort program to show that our logic can be used to prove program with indirectly-specified components.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access