Source author record

Xuan-Son Vu

Xuan-Son Vu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computation and Language Machine Learning math.NA Numerical Analysis

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

HSD Shared Task in VLSP Campaign 2019:Hate Speech Detection for Social Good

The paper describes the organisation of the "HateSpeech Detection" (HSD) task at the VLSP workshop 2019 on detecting the fine-grained presence of hate speech in Vietnamese textual items (i.e., messages) extracted from Facebook, which is the most popular social network site (SNS) in Vietnam. The task is organised as a multi-class classification task and based on a large-scale dataset containing 25,431 Vietnamese textual items from Facebook. The task participants were challenged to build a classification model that is capable of classifying an item to one of 3 classes, i.e., "HATE", "OFFENSIVE" and "CLEAN". HSD attracted a large number of participants and was a popular task at VLSP 2019. In particular, there were 71 teams signed up for the task, 14 of them submitted results with 380 valid submissions from 20th September 2019 to 4th October 2019.

preprint2020arXiv

Reinforced Data Sampling for Model Diversification

With the rising number of machine learning competitions, the world has witnessed an exciting race for the best algorithms. However, the involved data selection process may fundamentally suffer from evidence ambiguity and concept drift issues, thereby possibly leading to deleterious effects on the performance of various models. This paper proposes a new Reinforced Data Sampling (RDS) method to learn how to sample data adequately on the search for useful models and insights. We formulate the optimisation problem of model diversification $δ{-div}$ in data sampling to maximise learning potentials and optimum allocation by injecting model diversity. This work advocates the employment of diverse base learners as value functions such as neural networks, decision trees, or logistic regressions to reinforce the selection process of data subsets with multi-modal belief. We introduce different ensemble reward mechanisms, including soft voting and stochastic choice to approximate optimal sampling policy. The evaluation conducted on four datasets evidently highlights the benefits of using RDS method over traditional sampling approaches. Our experimental results suggest that the trainable sampling for model diversification is useful for competition organisers, researchers, or even starters to pursue full potentials of various machine learning tasks such as classification and regression. The source code is available at https://github.com/probeu/RDS.

preprint2014arXiv

Construction of Vietnamese SentiWordNet by using Vietnamese Dictionary

SentiWordNet is an important lexical resource supporting sentiment analysis in opinion mining applications. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to construct a Vietnamese SentiWordNet (VSWN). SentiWordNet is typically generated from WordNet in which each synset has numerical scores to indicate its opinion polarities. Many previous studies obtained these scores by applying a machine learning method to WordNet. However, Vietnamese WordNet is not available unfortunately by the time of this paper. Therefore, we propose a method to construct VSWN from a Vietnamese dictionary, not from WordNet. We show the effectiveness of the proposed method by generating a VSWN with 39,561 synsets automatically. The method is experimentally tested with 266 synsets with aspect of positivity and negativity. It attains a competitive result compared with English SentiWordNet that is 0.066 and 0.052 differences for positivity and negativity sets respectively.