Researcher profile

Xu Yang

Xu Yang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Computer Vision Machine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author

4works

0followers

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Correct Is Not Enough: Training Reasoning Planners with Executor-Grounded Rewards

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has become a common way to improve explicit reasoning in large language models, but final-answer correctness alone does not reveal whether the reasoning trace is faithful, reliable, or useful to the model that consumes it. This outcome-only signal can reinforce traces that are right for the wrong reasons, overstate reasoning gains by rewarding shortcuts, and propagate flawed intermediate states in multi-step systems. To this end, we propose TraceLift, a planner-executor training framework that treats reasoning as a consumable intermediate artifact. During planner training, the planner emits tagged reasoning. A frozen executor turns this reasoning into the final artifact for verifier feedback, while an executor-grounded reward shapes the intermediate trace. This reward multiplies a rubric-based Reasoning Reward Model (RM) score by measured uplift on the same frozen executor, crediting traces that are both high-quality and useful. To make reasoning quality directly learnable, we introduce TRACELIFT-GROUPS, a rubric-annotated reason-only dataset built from math and code seed problems. Each example is a same-problem group containing a high-quality reference trace and multiple plausible flawed traces with localized perturbations that reduce reasoning quality or solution support while preserving task relevance. Extensive experiments on code and math benchmarks show that this executor-grounded reasoning reward improves the two-stage planner-executor system over execution-only training, suggesting that reasoning supervision should evaluate not only whether a trace looks good, but also whether it helps the model that consumes it. Our code is available at: https://github.com/MasaiahHan/TraceLift

preprint2026arXiv

Hierarchical Dual-Subspace Decoupling for Continual Learning in Vision-Language Models

Class-incremental learning aims to continuously acquire new knowledge while preserving previously learned information, thereby mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Existing methods primarily restrict parameter updates but often overlook their structural properties in high-dimensional spaces. From a subspace perspective, updates induced by different tasks tend to lie in multiple overlapping low-rank subspaces, leading to cross-task subspace interference and severe forgetting. To address this issue, we propose HDSD, a Hierarchical Dual-Subspace Decoupling framework for continual learning in vision-language models. Specifically, we introduce a lightweight Feature Modulation Module (FMM) that explicitly decomposes the parameter space into general and task-specific subspaces. Building on this design, we develop two complementary components. First, a General Fusion Module (GFM) evaluates relative parameter changes across tasks and uses an adaptive threshold to capture stable and transferable knowledge. Second, a Hierarchical Learning Module (HLM) performs structured parameter decomposition via Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and uses a scaling mechanism to constrain updates within distinct subspace scales. Together, these designs reduce subspace interference and parameter drift. Extensive experiments on conventional benchmarks show that HDSD achieves state-of-the-art results.

preprint2026arXiv

Learngene Search Across Multiple Datasets for Building Variable-Sized Models

Deep learning methods are widely used under diverse resource constraints, resulting in models of varying sizes, such as the Vision Transformer (ViT) series. Deploying these models typically requires costly pretraining and finetuning. The Learngene paradigm addresses this issue by extracting transferable components, called learngenes, from a pretrained ancestry model (Ans-Net) to initialize variable-sized descendant models (Des-Nets).Existing learngene extraction methods rely on a single dataset, limiting downstream performance. To address this limitation, we propose Learngene Search Across Multiple Datasets for Building Variable-Sized Models (LSAMD). LSAMD expands the Ans-Net into a searchable super Ans-Net with dataset-specific blocks and dataset adapters (DADs). During training, LSAMD searches for an optimal architecture path for each dataset. The base blocks most frequently selected across datasets are extracted as learngenes for initializing Des-Nets.Experiments on multiple datasets show that LSAMD achieves performance comparable to pretrain-finetune methods while significantly reducing storage and training costs.

preprint2026arXiv

Understanding Performance Collapse in Layer-Pruned Large Language Models via Decision Representation Transitions

Layer pruning efficiently reduces Large Language Model (LLM) computational costs but often triggers sudden performance collapse. Existing representation-based analyses struggle to explain this mechanism. We propose studying pruning through decision representation. Focusing on multiple-choice tasks, we introduce two metrics, Decision Margin and Option Frequency, and an Iterative Pruning method to analyze layer-wise decision dynamics. Our findings reveal a sharp decision transition that partitions the network into two stages: a Silent Phase, where the model cannot yet predict the correct answer, and a Decisive Phase, where the correct prediction emerges. We also find that pruning the Decisive Phase has minimal impact, whereas pruning the Silent Phase triggers immediate performance collapse, highlighting its extreme sensitivity to structural changes. Therefore, we conclude that pruning-induced collapse stems from disrupting the Silent Phase, which prevents the critical decision transition from occurring.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint