BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Xin Yang Lu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We examine a non-local diffuse interface energy with Coulomb repulsion in three dimensions inspired by the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsäcker, and the Ohta-Kawasaki models. We consider the corresponding mass-constrained variational problem and show the existence of minimizers for small masses, and the absence of minimizers for large masses.
Loss function are an essential part in modern data-driven approach, such as bi-level training scheme and machine learnings. In this paper we propose a loss function consisting of a $r$-order (an)-isotropic total variation semi-norms $TV^r$, $r\in \mathbb{R}^+$, defined via the Riemann-Liouville (R-L) fractional derivative. We focus on studying key theoretical properties, such as the lower semi-continuity and compactness with respect to both the function and the order of derivative $r$, of such loss functions.
We consider the minimization of an average distance functional defined on a two-dimensional domain $Ω$ with an Euler elastica penalization associated with $\pd Ω$, the boundary of $Ω$. The average distance is given by \begin{equation*} \int_Ω \dist^p(x,\pd Ω)\d x \end{equation*} where $p\geq 1$ is a given parameter, and $\dist(x,\pd Ω)$ is the Hausdorff distance between $\{x\}$ and $\pd Ω$. The penalty term is a multiple of the Euler elastica (i.e., the Helfrich bending energy or the Willmore energy) of the boundary curve ${\pd Ω}$, which is proportional to the integrated squared curvature defined on $\pd Ω$, as given by \begin{equation*} \la \int_{\pd Ω} κ_{\pd Ω}^2\d\H_{\llcorner \pd Ω}^1, \end{equation*} where $κ_{\pd Ω}$ denotes the (signed) curvature of $\pd Ω$ and $\la>0$ denotes a penalty constant. The domain $Ω$ is allowed to vary among compact, convex sets of $\mathbb{R}^2$ with Hausdorff dimension equal to $2$\tcr{.} Under no a priori assumptions on the regularity of the boundary $\pd Ω$, we prove the existence of minimizers of $E_{p,\la}$. Moreover, we establish the $C^{1,1}$-regularity of its minimizers. An original construction of a suitable family of competitors plays a decisive role in proving the regularity.
In this paper we consider the functional \begin{equation*} E_{p,\la}(Ω):=\int_Ω\dist^p(x,\pd Ω)\d x+\la \frac{\H^1(\pd Ω)}{\H^2(Ω)}. \end{equation*} Here $p\geq 1$, $\la>0$ are given parameters, the unknown $Ω$ varies among compact, convex, Hausdorff two-dimensional sets of $\R^2$, $\pd Ω$ denotes the boundary of $Ω$, and $\dist(x,\pd Ω):=\inf_{y\in\pd Ω}|x-y|$. The integral term $\int_Ω\dist^p(x,\pd Ω)\d x$ quantifies the "easiness" for points in $Ω$ to reach the boundary, while $\frac{\H^1(\pd Ω)}{\H^2(Ω)}$ is the perimeter-to-area ratio. The main aim is to prove existence and $C^{1,1}$-regularity of minimizers of $\E$.
We study a 3D ternary system derived as a sharp-interface limit of the Nakazawa-Ohta density functional theory of triblock copolymers, which combines an interface energy with a long range interaction term. Although both the binary case in 2D and 3D, and the ternary case in 2D, are quite well studied, very little is known about the ternary case in 3D. In particular, it is even unclear whether minimizers are made of finitely many components. In this paper we provide a positive answer to this, by proving that the number of components in a minimizer is bounded from above by some quantity depending only on the total masses and the interaction coefficients. One key difficulty is that the 3D structure prevents us from uncoupling the Coulomb-like long range interaction from the perimeter term, hence the actual shape of minimizers is unknown, not even for small masses. This is due to the lack of a quantitative isoperimetric inequality with two mass constraints in 3D, and it makes the construction of competitors significantly more delicate.