Source author record

Xin Man

Xin Man appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Nearly Optimal Robust Method for Convex Compositional Problems with Heavy-Tailed Noise

In this paper, we propose robust stochastic algorithms for solving convex compositional problems of the form $f(\E_ξg(\cdot; ξ)) + r(\cdot)$ by establishing {\bf sub-Gaussian confidence bounds} under weak assumptions about the tails of noise distribution, i.e., {\bf heavy-tailed noise} with bounded second-order moments. One can achieve this goal by using an existing boosting strategy that boosts a low probability convergence result into a high probability result. However, piecing together existing results for solving compositional problems suffers from several drawbacks: (i) the boosting technique requires strong convexity of the objective; (ii) it requires a separate algorithm to handle non-smooth $r$; (iii) it also suffers from an additional polylogarithmic factor of the condition number. To address these issues, we directly develop a single-trial stochastic algorithm for minimizing optimal strongly convex compositional objectives, which has a nearly optimal high probability convergence result matching the lower bound of stochastic strongly convex optimization up to a logarithmic factor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that establishes nearly optimal sub-Gaussian confidence bounds for compositional problems under heavy-tailed assumptions.

preprint2020arXiv

The best way to select features?

Feature selection in machine learning is subject to the intrinsic randomness of the feature selection algorithms (for example, random permutations during MDA). Stability of selected features with respect to such randomness is essential to the human interpretability of a machine learning algorithm. We proposes a rank based stability metric called instability index to compare the stabilities of three feature selection algorithms MDA, LIME, and SHAP as applied to random forests. Typically, features are selected by averaging many random iterations of a selection algorithm. Though we find that the variability of the selected features does decrease as the number of iterations increases, it does not go to zero, and the features selected by the three algorithms do not necessarily converge to the same set. We find LIME and SHAP to be more stable than MDA, and LIME is at least as stable as SHAP for the top ranked features. Hence overall LIME is best suited for human interpretability. However, the selected set of features from all three algorithms significantly improves various predictive metrics out of sample, and their predictive performances do not differ significantly. Experiments were conducted on synthetic datasets, two public benchmark datasets, and on proprietary data from an active investment strategy.