Source author record

Ximing Xu

Ximing Xu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Robust Estimation for Discrete-Time State Space Models

State space models (SSMs) are now ubiquitous in many fields and increasingly complicated with observed and unobserved variables often interacting in non-linear fashions. The crucial task of validating model assumptions thus becomes difficult, particularly since some assumptions are formulated about unobserved states and thus cannot be checked with data. Motivated by the complex SSMs used for the assessment of fish stocks, we introduce a robust estimation method for SSMs. We prove the Fisher consistency of our estimator and propose an implementation based on automatic differentiation and the Laplace approximation of integrals which yields fast computations. Simulation studies demonstrate that our robust procedure performs well both with and without deviations from model assumptions. Applying it to the stock assessment model for pollock in the North Sea highlights the ability of our procedure to identify years with atypical observations.

preprint2016arXiv

Note on information bias and efficiency of composite likelihood

Does the asymptotic variance of the maximum composite likelihood estimator of a parameter of interest always decrease when the nuisance parameters are known? Will a composite likelihood necessarily become more efficient by incorporating addi- tional independent component likelihoods, or by using component likelihoods with higher dimension? In this note we show through illustrative examples that the an- swer to both questions is no, and indeed the opposite direction might be observed. The role of information bias is highlighted to understand the occurrence of these paradoxical phenomenon.