BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Won-Young Hwang

Won-Young Hwang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechgr-qcphysics.chem-phphysics.class-phphysics.ed-phphysics.optics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

A Coherent View on Entropy

Informational entropy is often identified as physical entropy. This is surprising because the two quantities are differently defined and furthermore the former is a subjective quantity while the latter is an objective one. We describe the problems and then present a possible view that reconciles the two entropies. Informational entropy of a system is interpreted as physical entropy of a whole composed of both the system and "memories" containing information about the system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

An Instructional Scaffolding for Intuitive Explanation of "Why does not a spinning top collapse?"

"Why does not a spinning top collapse?" is a puzzling question. Standard solution using angular momentum and torque is not intuitive enough. Thus intuitive explanations for the question have been proposed. We provide scaffolding for an intuitive explanation for the question. Accelerated point-masses in the top exert forces on the frame, which balances the effect due to gravity. The explanation is supplemented by the two following points. A more rigorous conceptual framework of the explanation is provided. A full calculation of trajectory is given. Nutation of spinning top is a difficult issue to understand physically. However, the nutation can also be understood by the intuitive explanation. We discuss another intuitive explanation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Optical Activity and Mirror-Symmetry

A misconception that non-chiral molecules have no optical activity at all is widespread. However, at molecular level even non-chiral molecules have optical activity. Optical activity of a non-chiral molecule is canceled out by that of another molecule in its mirror image in normal liquids. We describe the canceling mechanism by using mirror-symmetry of physical laws without resorting to detailed formulas. The description will be helpful for overcoming the misconception. Optical activity can be understood from the opposite viewpoint by the description. Aligned non-chiral molecules have optical activity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Optimal Discrimination of Qubit States - Methods, Solutions, and Properties

We show a geometric formulation for minimum-error discrimination of qubit states, that can be applied to arbitrary sets of qubit states given with arbitrary a priori probabilities. In particular, when qubit states are given with equal \emph{a priori} probabilities, we provide a systematic way of finding optimal discrimination and the complete solution in a closed form. This generally gives a bound to cases when prior probabilities are unequal. Then, it is shown that the guessing probability does not depend on detailed relations among given states, such as angles between them, but on a property that can be assigned by the set of given states itself. This also shows how a set of quantum states can be modified such that the guessing probability remains the same. Optimal measurements are also characterized accordingly, and a general method of finding them is provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Comment on "Security Proof for Cryptographic Protocols Based Only on Monogamy of Bell's Inequality Violations"

Recently, Pawlowski [Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010)] claimed to have proven the security of a quantum key distribution by using only the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations. In the proof, however, he tacitly assumed that the eavesdropper's outcome is binary. The assumption cannot be justified because Eve's (eavesdropper's) power can only be limited by natural principle. We provide a counter-example for a step of the proof.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

How to Device-Independently Generate States for Which Unambiguous State Discrimination is Impossible

We describe how to device-independently generate a set of quantum states for which unambiguous state discrimination is not possible. First, we derive a formula that a certain non-signaling black box must satisfy. Then, we describe how to generate a set of quantum states. Devices for generating states and possible measurements on the states can be put into a black box. Because this black box is non-signaling, it satisfies the formula. Using the formula, we prove that unambiguous state discrimination is not possible for the generated states. Because we did not consider internal mechanisms but only outcomes, our argument is valid for any (imperfect) devices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

No-signaling Principle Can Determine Optimal Quantum State Discrimination

We provide a general framework of utilizing the no-signaling principle in derivation of the guessing probability in the minimum-error quantum state discrimination. We show that, remarkably, the guessing probability can be determined by the no-signaling principle. This is shown by proving that in the semidefinite programming for the discrimination, the optimality condition corresponds to the constraint that quantum theory cannot be used for a superluminal communication. Finally, a general bound to the guessing probability is presented in a closed form.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Minimum-error multiple state discrimination constrained by the no-signaling principle

We provide a bound on the minimum error when discriminating among quantum states, using the no-signaling principle. The bound is general in that it depends on neither dimensions nor specific structures of given quantum states to be discriminated among. We show that the bound is tight for the minimum-error state discrimination between symmetric (both pure and mixed) qubit states. Moreover, the bound can be applied to a set of quantum states for which the minimum-error state discrimination is not known yet. Finally, our results strengthen the quantitative connection between two no-go theorems, the no-signaling principle and the no perfect state estimation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Optimal Quantum State Estimation with Use of the No-Signaling Principle

A simple derivation of the optimal state estimation of a quantum bit was obtained by using the no-signaling principle. In particular, the no-signaling principle determines a unique form of the guessing probability independently of figures of merit, such as the fidelity or information gain. This proves that the optimal estimation for a quantum bit can be achieved by the same measurement for almost all figures of merit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access