BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Witold R. Rudnicki

Witold R. Rudnicki appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningGenomics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Analysis of ensemble feature selection for correlated high-dimensional RNA-Seq cancer data

Discovery of diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers is important and actively pursued the research field in cancer research. For complex diseases, this process is often performed using Machine Learning. The current study compares two approaches for the discovery of relevant variables: by application of a single feature selection algorithm, versus by an ensemble of diverse algorithms. These approaches are used to identify variables that are relevant discerning of four cancer types using RNA-seq profiles from the Cancer Genome Atlas. The comparison is carried out in two directions: evaluating the predictive performance of models and monitoring the stability of selected variables. The most informative features are identified using a four feature selection algorithms, namely U-test, ReliefF, and two variants of the MDFS algorithm. Discerning normal and tumor tissues is performed using the Random Forest algorithm. The highest stability of the feature set was obtained when U-test was used. Unfortunately, models built on feature sets obtained from the ensemble of feature selection algorithms were no better than for models developed on feature sets obtained from individual algorithms. On the other hand, the feature selectors leading to the best classification results varied between data sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Bootstrap Bias Corrected Cross Validation applied to Super Learning

Super learner algorithm can be applied to combine results of multiple base learners to improve quality of predictions. The default method for verification of super learner results is by nested cross validation. It has been proposed by Tsamardinos et al., that nested cross validation can be replaced by resampling for tuning hyper-parameters of the learning algorithms. We apply this idea to verification of super learner and compare with other verification methods, including nested cross validation. Tests were performed on artificial data sets of diverse size and on seven real, biomedical data sets. The resampling method, called Bootstrap Bias Correction, proved to be a reasonably precise and very cost-efficient alternative for nested cross validation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Random forest models of the retention constants in the thin layer chromatography

In the current study we examine an application of the machine learning methods to model the retention constants in the thin layer chromatography (TLC). This problem can be described with hundreds or even thousands of descriptors relevant to various molecular properties, most of them redundant and not relevant for the retention constant prediction. Hence we employed feature selection to significantly reduce the number of attributes. Additionally we have tested application of the bagging procedure to the feature selection. The random forest regression models were built using selected variables. The resulting models have better correlation with the experimental data than the reference models obtained with linear regression. The cross-validation confirms robustness of the models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The All Relevant Feature Selection using Random Forest

In this paper we examine the application of the random forest classifier for the all relevant feature selection problem. To this end we first examine two recently proposed all relevant feature selection algorithms, both being a random forest wrappers, on a series of synthetic data sets with varying size. We show that reasonable accuracy of predictions can be achieved and that heuristic algorithms that were designed to handle the all relevant problem, have performance that is close to that of the reference ideal algorithm. Then, we apply one of the algorithms to four families of semi-synthetic data sets to assess how the properties of particular data set influence results of feature selection. Finally we test the procedure using a well-known gene expression data set. The relevance of nearly all previously established important genes was confirmed, moreover the relevance of several new ones is discovered.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access