BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

William P. Segars

William P. Segars contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Visioneess.IVphysics.med-phArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learningmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

MRXCAT-CDTI: A Numerical Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging Phantom

Magnetic Resonance cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) and cardiac intravoxel incoherent motion imaging enables probing of in vivo myofiber architecture and myocardial perfusion surrogates. To study the impact of experimental parameters such as resolution, off-resonances and heart-rate variations, we propose a numerical open-source framework called MRXCAT-CDTI. It allows simulating diffusion and perfusion contrast for spin-echo (SE) and stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) cDTI sequences. The Fourier encoder supports in-plane and/or through-slice off-resonance effects, as well as T2* effects during single-shot image encoding. Optional lesions are included to mimic ischemic and infarcted myocardial regions. MRXCAT-CDTI allows assessing realistic influences on data acquisition, and how these affect the data encoding process and subsequent data processing. As an example, heart-rate variations lead to differences in partial saturation and relaxation of magnetization that end up in errors of 9 to 30% for cDTI angle metrics if not accounted for. For SE echo-planar cDTI, in-plane off-resonance effects more adversely affect cDTI metrics compared to through-slice off-resonances. With this work we propose an open-source MRXCAT-CDTI numerical simulation framework that offers realistic image encoding effects found in cardiac diffusion and perfusion data to systematically study influences of data encoding, reconstruction, and post-processing to promote reproducible research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Quality or Quantity: Toward a Unified Approach for Multi-organ Segmentation in Body CT

Organ segmentation of medical images is a key step in virtual imaging trials. However, organ segmentation datasets are limited in terms of quality (because labels cover only a few organs) and quantity (since case numbers are limited). In this study, we explored the tradeoffs between quality and quantity. Our goal is to create a unified approach for multi-organ segmentation of body CT, which will facilitate the creation of large numbers of accurate virtual phantoms. Initially, we compared two segmentation architectures, 3D-Unet and DenseVNet, which were trained using XCAT data that is fully labeled with 22 organs, and chose the 3D-Unet as the better performing model. We used the XCAT-trained model to generate pseudo-labels for the CT-ORG dataset that has only 7 organs segmented. We performed two experiments: First, we trained 3D-UNet model on the XCAT dataset, representing quality data, and tested it on both XCAT and CT-ORG datasets. Second, we trained 3D-UNet after including the CT-ORG dataset into the training set to have more quantity. Performance improved for segmentation in the organs where we have true labels in both datasets and degraded when relying on pseudo-labels. When organs were labeled in both datasets, Exp-2 improved Average DSC in XCAT and CT-ORG by 1. This demonstrates that quality data is the key to improving the model's performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

iPhantom: a framework for automated creation of individualized computational phantoms and its application to CT organ dosimetry

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a novel framework, iPhantom, for automated creation of patient-specific phantoms or digital-twins (DT) using patient medical images. The framework is applied to assess radiation dose to radiosensitive organs in CT imaging of individual patients. Method: From patient CT images, iPhantom segments selected anchor organs (e.g. liver, bones, pancreas) using a learning-based model developed for multi-organ CT segmentation. Organs challenging to segment (e.g. intestines) are incorporated from a matched phantom template, using a diffeomorphic registration model developed for multi-organ phantom-voxels. The resulting full-patient phantoms are used to assess organ doses during routine CT exams. Result: iPhantom was validated on both the XCAT (n=50) and an independent clinical (n=10) dataset with similar accuracy. iPhantom precisely predicted all organ locations with good accuracy of Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) >0.6 for anchor organs and DSC of 0.3-0.9 for all other organs. iPhantom showed less than 10% dose errors for the majority of organs, which was notably superior to the state-of-the-art baseline method (20-35% dose errors). Conclusion: iPhantom enables automated and accurate creation of patient-specific phantoms and, for the first time, provides sufficient and automated patient-specific dose estimates for CT dosimetry. Significance: The new framework brings the creation and application of CHPs to the level of individual CHPs through automation, achieving a wider and precise organ localization, paving the way for clinical monitoring, and personalized optimization, and large-scale research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access