BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

William L. Kath

William L. Kath appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
cond-mat.dis-nnMolecular Networksnlin.CDphysics.soc-phmath.OCBiological Physicscond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AOphysics.data-anSocial and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Control of stochastic and induced switching in biophysical networks

Noise caused by fluctuations at the molecular level is a fundamental part of intracellular processes. While the response of biological systems to noise has been studied extensively, there has been limited understanding of how to exploit it to induce a desired cell state. Here we present a scalable, quantitative method based on the Freidlin-Wentzell action to predict and control noise-induced switching between different states in genetic networks that, conveniently, can also control transitions between stable states in the absence of noise. We apply this methodology to models of cell differentiation and show how predicted manipulations of tunable factors can induce lineage changes, and further utilize it to identify new candidate strategies for cancer therapy in a cell death pathway model. This framework offers a systems approach to identifying the key factors for rationally manipulating biophysical dynamics, and should also find use in controlling other classes of noisy complex networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Realistic Control of Network Dynamics

The control of complex networks is of paramount importance in areas as diverse as ecosystem management, emergency response, and cell reprogramming. A fundamental property of networks is that perturbations to one node can affect other nodes, potentially causing the entire system to change behavior or fail. Here, we show that it is possible to exploit the same principle to control network behavior. Our approach accounts for the nonlinear dynamics inherent to real systems, and allows bringing the system to a desired target state even when this state is not directly accessible due to constraints that limit the allowed interventions. Applications show that this framework permits reprogramming a network to a desired task as well as rescuing networks from the brink of failure---which we illustrate through the mitigation of cascading failures in a power-grid network and the identification of potential drug targets in a signaling network of human cancer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Comment on "Controllability of Complex Networks with Nonlinear Dynamics"

The recent paper by W.-X. Wang, Y.-C. Lai, J. Ren, B. Li & C. Grebogi [arXiv:1107.2177v1] proposed a method for the control of complex networks with nonlinear dynamics based on linearizing the system around a finite number of local desired states. The authors purport that any bidirectional network with one-dimensional intrinsic node dynamics can be fully controlled by a single driver node, which can be any node in the network, regardless of the network topology. According to this result, a network with an arbitrarily large number of nodes (a million, a billion, or even more) could be controlled by a single node. Here we show, however, that this result is specious and that it does not hold true even for networks with only two nodes. We demonstrate that the erroneous results are a consequence of a fundamental flaw in the proposed method, namely, that reaching a local desired state using the proposed linearization procedure generally requires a nonlocal trajectory, which grossly violates the linear approximation. Their further conclusion that network systems with nonlinear dynamics are more controllable than those with linear dynamics is a known fact presented as novel based on a flawed argument. A central problem underlying the authors' argument is that their formulation is entirely based on the number of driver nodes required to reach a desired state---even when this number is one, keeping the system at that desired state generally requires directly controlling all nodes in the network. When this is taken into account, the conclusion that nonlinear dynamics can facilitate network control was already anticipated in S.P. Cornelius, W.L. Kath & A.E. Motter [arXiv:1105.3726v1], which is not referenced in their paper. If one insists on using the authors' formulation, then, in contradiction to their claim, nonlinear systems would never be more controllable than linear ones because...

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Controlling Complex Networks with Compensatory Perturbations

The response of complex networks to perturbations is of utmost importance in areas as diverse as ecosystem management, emergency response, and cell reprogramming. A fundamental property of networks is that the perturbation of one node can affect other nodes, in a process that may cause the entire or substantial part of the system to change behavior and possibly collapse. Recent research in metabolic and food-web networks has demonstrated the concept that network damage caused by external perturbations can often be mitigated or reversed by the application of compensatory perturbations. Compensatory perturbations are constrained to be physically admissible and amenable to implementation on the network. However, the systematic identification of compensatory perturbations that conform to these constraints remains an open problem. Here, we present a method to construct compensatory perturbations that can control the fate of general networks under such constraints. Our approach accounts for the full nonlinear behavior of real complex networks and can bring the system to a desirable target state even when this state is not directly accessible. Applications to genetic networks show that compensatory perturbations are effective even when limited to a small fraction of all nodes in the network and that they are far more effective when limited to the highest-degree nodes. The approach is conceptually simple and computationally efficient, making it suitable for the rescue, control, and reprogramming of large complex networks in various domains.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access