Source author record

William Gropp

William Gropp appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing cs.CY Hardware Architecture Performance

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Performance Analysis and Optimal Node-Aware Communication for Enlarged Conjugate Gradient Methods

Krylov methods are a key way of solving large sparse linear systems of equations, but suffer from poor strong scalabilty on distributed memory machines. This is due to high synchronization costs from large numbers of collective communication calls alongside a low computational workload. Enlarged Krylov methods address this issue by decreasing the total iterations to convergence, an artifact of splitting the initial residual and resulting in operations on block vectors. In this paper, we present a performance study of an Enlarged Krylov Method, Enlarged Conjugate Gradients (ECG), noting the impact of block vectors on parallel performance at scale. Most notably, we observe the increased overhead of point-to-point communication as a result of denser messages in the sparse matrix-block vector multiplication kernel. Additionally, we present models to analyze expected performance of ECG, as well as, motivate design decisions. Most importantly, we introduce a new point-to-point communication approach based on node-aware communication techniques that increases efficiency of the method at scale.

preprint2021arXiv

Advancing Computing's Foundation of US Industry & Society

While past information technology (IT) advances have transformed society, future advances hold even greater promise. For example, we have only just begun to reap the changes from artificial intelligence (AI), especially machine learning (ML). Underlying IT's impact are the dramatic improvements in computer hardware, which deliver performance that unlock new capabilities. For example, recent successes in AI/ML required the synergy of improved algorithms and hardware architectures (e.g., general-purpose graphics processing units). However, unlike in the 20th Century and early 2000s, tomorrow's performance aspirations must be achieved without continued semiconductor scaling formerly provided by Moore's Law and Dennard Scaling. How will one deliver the next 100x improvement in capability at similar or less cost to enable great value? Can we make the next AI leap without 100x better hardware? This whitepaper argues for a multipronged effort to develop new computing approaches beyond Moore's Law to advance the foundation that computing provides to US industry, education, medicine, science, and government. This impact extends far beyond the IT industry itself, as IT is now central for providing value across society, for example in semi-autonomous vehicles, tele-education, health wearables, viral analysis, and efficient administration. Herein we draw upon considerable visioning work by CRA's Computing Community Consortium (CCC) and the IEEE Rebooting Computing Initiative (IEEE RCI), enabled by thought leader input from industry, academia, and the US government.

preprint2020arXiv

FFT, FMM, and Multigrid on the Road to Exascale: performance challenges and opportunities

FFT, FMM, and multigrid methods are widely used fast and highly scalable solvers for elliptic PDEs. However, emerging large-scale computing systems are introducing challenges in comparison to current petascale computers. Recent efforts (Dongarra et al. 2011) have identified several constraints in the design of exascale software that includes massive concurrency, resilience management, exploiting the high performance of heterogeneous systems, energy efficiency, and utilizing the deeper and more complex memory hierarchy expected at exascale. In this paper, we perform a model-based comparison of the FFT, FMM, and multigrid methods in the context of these projected constraints. In addition, we use performance models to offer predictions about the expected performance on upcoming exascale system configurations based on current technology trends.

preprint2016arXiv

Performance Modeling of Distributed Deep Neural Networks

During the past decade, machine learning has become extremely popular and can be found in many aspects of our every day life. Nowayadays with explosion of data while rapid growth of computation capacity, Distributed Deep Neural Networks (DDNNs) which can improve their performance linearly with more computation resources, have become hot and trending. However, there has not been an in depth study of the performance of these systems, and how well they scale. In this paper we analyze CNTK, one of the most commonly used DDNNs, by first building a performance model and then evaluating the system two settings: a small cluster with all nodes in a single rack connected to a top of rack switch, and in large scale using Blue Waters with arbitary placement of nodes. Our main focus was the scalability of the system with respect to adding more nodes. Based on our results, this system has an excessive initialization overhead because of poor I/O utilization which dominates the whole execution time. Because of this, the system does not scale beyond a few nodes (4 in Blue Waters). Additionally, due to a single server-multiple worker design the server becomes a bottleneck after 16 nodes limiting the scalability of the CNTK.