BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

William Gasarch

William Gasarch contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Applications of the Canonical Ramsey Theorem to Geometry

Let P be a set of n points in R^d. How big is the largest subset X of P such that all of the distances determined between pairs are different? We show that X is at at least Omega(n^{1/6d}) This is not the best known; however the technique is new. Assume that no three of the original points are collinear. How big is the largest subset X of P such that all of the areas determined by elements of all triples are different? We show that, if d=2 then X is at least Omega((log log n)^{1/186}) and if d=3 then X is at least Omega((log log n)^{1/396}). We also obtain results for countable sets of points in R^d. All of our proofs use variants of the canonical Ramsey theorem and some geometric lemmas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A Statement in Combinatorics that is Independent of ZFC (an exposition)

It is known that, for any finite coloring of the naturals, there exists distinct naturals $e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4$ that are the same color such that $e_1+e_2=e_3+e_4$. Consider the following statement which we denote S: For every $\aleph_0$-coloring of the reals there exists distinct reals $e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4$ such that $e_1+e_2=e_3+e_4$?} Is it true? Erdos showed that S is equivalent to the negation of the Continuum Hypothesis, and hence S is indepedent of ZFC. We give an exposition of his proof and some modern observations about results of this sort.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

New Upper and Lower Bounds on the Rado Numbers

If E is a linear homogenous equation and c a natural then the Rado number $R_c(E)$ is the least N so that any c-coloring of the positive integers from 1 to N contains a monochromatic solution. Rado characterized for which E R_c(E) always exists. The original proof of Rado's theorem gave enormous bounds on R_c(E) (when it existed). In this paper we establish better upper bounds, and some lower bounds, for R_c(E) for some c and E. In the appendix we use some of our theorems, and ideas from a probabilistic SAT solver, to find many new Rado Numbers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Rectangle Free Coloring of Grids

A two-dimensional \emph{grid} is a set $\Gnm = [n]\times[m]$. A grid $\Gnm$ is \emph{$c$-colorable} if there is a function $χ_{n,m}: \Gnm \to [c]$ such that there are no rectangles with all four corners the same color. We address the following question: for which values of $n$ and $m$ is $\Gnm$ $c$-colorable? This problem can be viewed as a bipartite Ramsey problem and is related to a the Gallai-Witt theorem (also called the multidimensioanl Van Der Waerden's Theorem). We determine (1) \emph{exactly} which grids are 2-colorable, (2) \emph{exactly} which grids are 3-colorable, and (3) \emph{exactly} which grids are 4-colorable. We use combinatorics, finite fields, and tournament graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Three Proofs of the Hypergraph Ramsey Theorem (An exposition)

Ramsey, Erdos-Rado, and Conlon-Fox-Sudakov have given proofs of the 3-hypergraph Ramsey Theorem with better and better upper bounds on the 3-hypergraph Ramsey Number. Ramsey and Erdos-Rado also prove the a-hypergraph Ramsey Theorem. Conlon-Fox-Sudakov note that their upper bounds on the 3-hypergraph Ramsey Numbers, together with a recurrence of Erdos-Rado (which was the key to the Erdos-Rado proof), yield improved bounds on the a-hypergraph Ramsey numbers. We present all of these proofs and state explicit bounds for the 2-color case and the c-color case. We give a more detailed analysis of the construction of Conlon-Fox-Sudakov and hence obtain a slightly better bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Lower Bounds on the van der Waerden Numbers: Randomized- and Deterministic-Constructive

The van der Waerden number W(k,2) is the smallest integer n such that every 2-coloring of 1 to n has a monochromatic arithmetic progression of length k. The existence of such an n for any k is due to van der Waerden but known upper bounds on W(k,2) are enormous. Much effort was put into developing lower bounds on W(k,2). Most of these lower bound proofs employ the probabilistic method often in combination with the Lovász Local Lemma. While these proofs show the existence of a 2-coloring that has no monochromatic arithmetic progression of length k they provide no efficient algorithm to find such a coloring. These kind of proofs are often informally called nonconstructive in contrast to constructive proofs that provide an efficient algorithm. This paper clarifies these notions and gives definitions for deterministic- and randomized-constructive proofs as different types of constructive proofs. We then survey the literature on lower bounds on W(k,2) in this light. We show how known nonconstructive lower bound proofs based on the Lovász Local Lemma can be made randomized-constructive using the recent algorithms of Moser and Tardos. We also use a derandomization of Chandrasekaran, Goyal and Haeupler to transform these proofs into deterministic-constructive proofs. We provide greatly simplified and fully self-contained proofs and descriptions for these algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access