BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stephen Fenner

Stephen Fenner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COComputational Complexitymath-phmath.CVmath.MGmath.MPquant-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Depth-2 QAC circuits cannot simulate quantum parity

We show that the quantum parity gate on $n > 3$ qubits cannot be cleanly simulated by a quantum circuit with two layers of arbitrary C-SIGN gates of any arity and arbitrary 1-qubit unitary gates, regardless of the number of allowed ancilla qubits. This is the best known and first nontrivial separation between the parity gate and circuits of this form. The same bounds also apply to the quantum fanout gate. Our results are incomparable with those of Fang et al. [3], which apply to any constant depth but require a sublinear number of ancilla qubits on the simulating circuit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fixed-Parameter Extrapolation and Aperiodic Order

Fix any $λ\in\mathbb{C}$. We say that a set $S\subseteq\mathbb{C}$ is $λ$-$convex$ if, whenever $a$ and $b$ are in $S$, the point $(1-λ)a+λb$ is also in $S$. If $S$ is also (topologically) closed, then we say that $S$ is $λ$-$clonvex$. We investigate the properties of $λ$-convex and $λ$-clonvex sets and prove a number of facts about them. Letting $R_λ\subseteq\mathbb{C}$ be the least $λ$-clonvex superset of $\{0,1\}$, we show that if $R_λ$ is convex in the usual sense, then $R_λ$ must be either $[0,1]$ or $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$, depending on $λ$. We investigate which $λ$ make $R_λ$ convex, derive a number of conditions equivalent to $R_λ$ being convex, and give several conditions sufficient for $R_λ$ to be convex or not convex; in particular, we show that $R_λ$ is either convex or uniformly discrete. Letting $\mathcal{C} := \{λ\in\mathbb{C}\mid \mbox{$R_λ$ is convex}\}$, we show that $\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathcal{C}$ is closed, discrete and contains only algebraic integers. We also give a sufficient condition on $λ$ for $R_λ$ and some other related $λ$-convex sets to be discrete by introducing the notion of a strong PV number. These conditions give rise to a number of periodic and aperiodic Meyer sets (the latter sometimes known as "quasicrystals"). The paper is in four parts. Part I describes basic properties of $λ$-convex and $λ$-clonvex sets, including convexity versus uniform discreteness. Part II explores the connections between $λ$-convex sets and quasicrystals and displays a number of such sets, including several with dihedral symmetry. Part III generalizes a result from Part I about the $λ$-convex closure of a path, and Part IV contains our conclusions and open problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A Statement in Combinatorics that is Independent of ZFC (an exposition)

It is known that, for any finite coloring of the naturals, there exists distinct naturals $e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4$ that are the same color such that $e_1+e_2=e_3+e_4$. Consider the following statement which we denote S: For every $\aleph_0$-coloring of the reals there exists distinct reals $e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4$ such that $e_1+e_2=e_3+e_4$?} Is it true? Erdos showed that S is equivalent to the negation of the Continuum Hypothesis, and hence S is indepedent of ZFC. We give an exposition of his proof and some modern observations about results of this sort.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Rectangle Free Coloring of Grids

A two-dimensional \emph{grid} is a set $\Gnm = [n]\times[m]$. A grid $\Gnm$ is \emph{$c$-colorable} if there is a function $χ_{n,m}: \Gnm \to [c]$ such that there are no rectangles with all four corners the same color. We address the following question: for which values of $n$ and $m$ is $\Gnm$ $c$-colorable? This problem can be viewed as a bipartite Ramsey problem and is related to a the Gallai-Witt theorem (also called the multidimensioanl Van Der Waerden's Theorem). We determine (1) \emph{exactly} which grids are 2-colorable, (2) \emph{exactly} which grids are 3-colorable, and (3) \emph{exactly} which grids are 4-colorable. We use combinatorics, finite fields, and tournament graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access