Researcher profile

William D. Parker

William D. Parker contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline

3works

0followers

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2015arXiv

Nanosecond Phase Transition Dynamics in Compressively Strained Epitaxial BiFeO3

A highly strained BiFeO3 (BFO) thin film is transformed between phases with distinct structures and properties by nanosecond-duration applied electric field pulses. Time-resolved synchrotron x-ray microdiffraction shows that the steady-state transformation between phases is accompanied by a dynamical component that is reversed upon the removal of the field. Steady-state measurements reveal that approximately 20% of the volume of a BFO thin film grown on a LaAlO3 substrate can be reproducibly transformed between rhombohedral-like and tetragonal-like phases by electric field pulses with magnitudes up to 2 MV/cm. A transient component, in which the transformation is reversed following the end of the electric field pulse, can transform a similar fraction of the BFO layer and occurs rapidly time scale limited by the charging time constant of the thin film capacitor. The piezoelectric expansion of the tetragonal-like phase leads to a strain of up to 0.1%, with a lower limit of 10 pm/V for the piezoelectric coefficient of this phase. Density functional theory calculations provide insight into the mechanism of the phase transformation showing that imparting a transient strain of this magnitude favors a transformation from rhombohedral-like to tetragonal-like phase.

preprint2014arXiv

Comparison of polynomial approximations to speed up planewave-based quantum Monte Carlo calculations

The computational cost of quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations of realistic periodic systems depends strongly on the method of storing and evaluating the many-particle wave function. Previous work [A. J. Williamson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 246406 (2001); D. Alfè and M. J. Gillan, Phys. Rev. B 70, 161101 (2004)] has demonstrated the reduction of the O(N^3) cost of evaluating the Slater determinant with planewaves to O(N^2) using localized basis functions. We compare four polynomial approximations as basis functions -- interpolating Lagrange polynomials, interpolating piecewise-polynomial-form (pp-) splines, and basis-form (B-) splines (interpolating and smoothing). All these basis functions provide a similar speedup relative to the planewave basis. The pp-splines have eight times the memory requirement of the other methods. To test the accuracy of the basis functions, we apply them to the ground state structures of Si, Al, and MgO. The polynomial approximations differ in accuracy most strongly for MgO and smoothing B-splines most closely reproduce the planewave value for of the variational Monte Carlo energy. Using separate approximations for the Laplacian of the orbitals increases the accuracy sufficiently to justify the increased memory requirement, making smoothing B-splines, with separate approximation for the Laplacian, the preferred choice for approximating planewave-represented orbitals in QMC calculations.

preprint2010arXiv

Accuracy of Quantum Monte Carlo Methods for Point Defects in Solids

Quantum Monte Carlo approaches such as the diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) method are among the most accurate many-body methods for extended systems. Their scaling makes them well suited for defect calculations in solids. We review the various approximations needed for DMC calculations of solids and the results of previous DMC calculations for point defects in solids. Finally, we present estimates of how approximations affect the accuracy of calculations for self-interstitial formation energies in silicon and predict DMC values of 4.4(1), 5.1(1) and 4.7(1) eV for the X, T and H interstitial defects, respectively, in a 16(+1)-atom supercell.