Researcher profile

Weng-Keen Wong

Weng-Keen Wong contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

LatentDiff: Scaling Semantic Dataset Comparison to Millions of Images

We present LatentDiff, a scalable framework for semantic dataset comparison that operates directly in the latent space of pretrained vision encoders. By combining sparse autoencoder-based divergence testing with density ratio estimation, LatentDiff identifies interpretable semantic differences between datasets at a fraction of the computational cost of caption-based alternatives. We also introduce Noisy-Diff, a benchmark capturing realistic sparse distribution shifts that cause existing methods to struggle. Experiments demonstrate that LatentDiff achieves superior accuracy while remaining robust to settings where an extremely small fraction of images (from 5% to <1% ) differ semantically.

preprint2022arXiv

Tweak: Towards Portable Deep Learning Models for Domain-Agnostic LoRa Device Authentication

Deep learning based device fingerprinting has emerged as a key method of identifying and authenticating devices solely via their captured RF transmissions. Conventional approaches are not portable to different domains in that if a model is trained on data from one domain, it will not perform well on data from a different but related domain. Examples of such domains include the receiver hardware used for collecting the data, the day/time on which data was captured, and the protocol configuration of devices. This work proposes Tweak, a technique that, using metric learning and a calibration process, enables a model trained with data from one domain to perform well on data from another domain. This process is accomplished with only a small amount of training data from the target domain and without changing the weights of the model, which makes the technique computationally lightweight and thus suitable for resource-limited IoT networks. This work evaluates the effectiveness of Tweak vis-a-vis its ability to identify IoT devices using a testbed of real LoRa-enabled devices under various scenarios. The results of this evaluation show that Tweak is viable and especially useful for networks with limited computational resources and applications with time-sensitive missions.

preprint2021arXiv

Counterfactual State Explanations for Reinforcement Learning Agents via Generative Deep Learning

Counterfactual explanations, which deal with &#34;why not?&#34; scenarios, can provide insightful explanations to an AI agent&#39;s behavior. In this work, we focus on generating counterfactual explanations for deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents which operate in visual input environments like Atari. We introduce counterfactual state explanations, a novel example-based approach to counterfactual explanations based on generative deep learning. Specifically, a counterfactual state illustrates what minimal change is needed to an Atari game image such that the agent chooses a different action. We also evaluate the effectiveness of counterfactual states on human participants who are not machine learning experts. Our first user study investigates if humans can discern if the counterfactual state explanations are produced by the actual game or produced by a generative deep learning approach. Our second user study investigates if counterfactual state explanations can help non-expert participants identify a flawed agent; we compare against a baseline approach based on a nearest neighbor explanation which uses images from the actual game. Our results indicate that counterfactual state explanations have sufficient fidelity to the actual game images to enable non-experts to more effectively identify a flawed RL agent compared to the nearest neighbor baseline and to having no explanation at all.