BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Warren Hare

Warren Hare contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NAmath.OCNumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Error Analysis of Surrogate Models Constructed through Operations on Sub-models

Model-based methods are popular in derivative-free optimization (DFO). In most of them, a single model function is built to approximate the objective function. This is generally based on the assumption that the objective function is one blackbox. However, some real-life and theoretical problems show that the objective function may consist of several blackboxes. In those problems, the information provided by each blackbox may not be equal. In this situation, one could build multiple sub-models that are then combined to become a final model. In this paper, we analyze the relation between the accuracy of those sub-models and the model constructed through their operations. We develop a broad framework that can be used as a theoretical tool in model error analysis and future research in DFO algorithms design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A deterministic algorithm to compute the cosine measure of a finite positive spanning set

Originally developed in 1954, positive bases and positive spanning sets have been found to be a valuable concept in derivative-free optimization (DFO). The quality of a positive basis (or positive spanning set) can be quantified via the {\em cosine measure} and convergence properties of certain DFO algorithms are intimately linked to the value of this measure. However, it is unclear how to compute the cosine measure for a positive basis from the definition. In this paper, a deterministic algorithm to compute the cosine measure of any positive basis or finite positive spanning set is provided. The algorithm is proven to return the exact value of the cosine measure in finite time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Error bounds for overdetermined and underdetermined generalized centred simplex gradients

Using the Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse, this work generalizes the gradient approximation technique called centred simplex gradient to allow sample sets containing any number of points. This approximation technique is called the \emph{generalized centred simplex gradient}. We develop error bounds and, under a full-rank condition, show that the error bounds have order $O(Δ^2)$, where $Δ$ is the radius of the sample set of points used. We establish calculus rules for generalized centred simplex gradients, introduce a calculus-based generalized centred simplex gradient and confirm that error bounds for this new approach are also order $O(Δ^2)$. We provide several examples to illustrate the results and some benefits of these new methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access