BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vittorio Loreto

Vittorio Loreto contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phApplicationsMachine LearningSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Loss of sustainability in scientific work

For decades the number of scientific publications has been rapidly increasing, effectively out-dating knowledge at a tremendous rate. Only few scientific milestones remain relevant and continuously attract citations. Here we quantify how long scientific work remains being utilized, how long it takes before today's work is forgotten, and how milestone papers differ from those forgotten. To answer these questions, we study the complete temporal citation network of all American Physical Society journals. We quantify the probability of attracting citations for individual publications based on age and the number of citations they have received in the past. We capture both aspects, the forgetting and the tendency to cite already popular works, in a microscopic generative model for the dynamics of scientific citation networks. We find that the probability of citing a specific paper declines with age as a power law with an exponent of $α\sim -1.4$. Whenever a paper in its early years can be characterized by a scaling exponent above a critical value, $α_c$, the paper is likely to become "ever-lasting". We validate the model with out-of-sample predictions, with an accuracy of up to 90% (AUC $\sim 0.9$). The model also allows us to estimate an expected citation landscape of the future, predicting that 95% of papers cited in 2050 have yet to be published. The exponential growth of articles, combined with a power-law type of forgetting and papers receiving fewer and fewer citations on average, suggests a worrying tendency toward information overload and raises concerns about scientific publishing's long-term sustainability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Social interactions affect discovery processes

Our network of acquaintances determines how we get exposed to ideas, products, or cultural artworks (books, music, movies, etc.). Though this principle is part of our common sense, little is known about the specific pathways through which our peers influence our discovery processes and our experience of the new. Here, we fill this gap by investigating a data set containing the whole listening histories of a large, socially connected sample of users from the online music platform \emph{Last.fm}. We demonstrate that users exhibit highly heterogeneous discovery rates of new songs and artists and that their social neighborhood significantly influences their behavior. More explorative users tend to interact with peers more prone to explore new content. We capture this phenomenology in a modeling scheme where users are represented by random walkers exploring a graph of songs or artists and interacting with each other through their social links. Even starting from a uniform population of agents (no natural differences among the individuals), our model predicts the emergence of strong heterogeneous exploration patterns, with users clustered according to their musical tastes and propensity to explore. We contend our approach can pave the way to a quantitative approach to collective discovery processes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Quantifying exaptation in scientific evolution

Rediscovering a new function for something can be just as important as the discovery itself. In 1982, Stephen Jay Gould and Elisabeth Vrba named this phenomenon Exaptation to describe a radical shift in the function of a specific trait during biological evolution. While exaptation is thought to be a fundamental mechanism for generating adaptive innovations, diversity, and sophisticated features, relatively little effort has been made to quantify exaptation outside the topic of biological evolution. We think that this concept provides a useful framework for characterising the emergence of innovations in science. This article explores the notion that exaptation arises from the usage of scientific ideas in domains other than the area that they were originally applied to. In particular, we adopt a normalised entropy and an inverse participation ratio as observables that reveal and quantify the concept of exaptation. We identify distinctive patterns of exaptation and expose specific examples of papers that display those patterns. Our approach represents a first step towards the quantification of exaptation phenomena in the context of scientific evolution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The exploration of the Adjacent Possible explains the emergence and evolution of social networks

The interactions among human beings represent the backbone of our societies. How people interact, establish new connections, and allocate their activities among these links can reveal a lot of our social organization. Despite focused attention by very diverse scientific communities, we still lack a first-principles modeling framework able to account for the birth and evolution of social networks. Here, we tackle this problem by looking at social interactions as a way to explore a very peculiar space, namely the adjacent possible space, i.e., the set of individuals we can meet at any given point in time during our lifetime. We leverage on a recent mathematical formalization of the adjacent possible space to propose a first-principles theory of social exploration based on simple microscopic rules defining how people get in touch and interact. The new theory predicts both microscopic and macroscopic features of social networks. The most striking feature captured on the microscopic side is the probability for an individual, with already $k$ connections, to acquire a new acquaintance. On the macroscopic side, the model reproduces the main static and dynamic features of social networks: the broad distribution of degree and activities, the average clustering coefficient and the innovation rate at the global and local level. The theory is born out in three diverse real-world social networks: the network of mentions between Twitter users, the network of co-authorship of the American Physical Society and a mobile-phone-call network.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Unsupervised inference approach to facial attractiveness

The perception of facial beauty is a complex phenomenon depending on many, detailed and global facial features influencing each other. In the machine learning community this problem is typically tackled as a problem of supervised inference. However, it has been conjectured that this approach does not capture the complexity of the phenomenon. A recent original experiment (Ibáñez-Berganza et al., Scientific Reports 9, 8364, 2019) allowed different human subjects to navigate the face-space and ``sculpt'' their preferred modification of a reference facial portrait. Here we present an unsupervised inference study of the set of sculpted facial vectors in that experiment. We first infer minimal, interpretable, and faithful probabilistic models (through Maximum Entropy and artificial neural networks) of the preferred facial variations, that capture the origin of the observed inter-subject diversity in the sculpted faces. The application of such generative models to the supervised classification of the gender of the sculpting subjects, reveals an astonishingly high prediction accuracy. This result suggests that much relevant information regarding the subjects may influence (and be elicited from) her/his facial preference criteria, in agreement with the multiple motive theory of attractiveness proposed in previous works.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access