BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Vitor Greati

Vitor Greati appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer Sciencemath.LO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Generating proof systems for three-valued propositional logics

In general, providing an axiomatization for an arbitrary logic is a task that may require some ingenuity. In the case of logics defined by a finite logical matrix (three-valued logics being a particularly simple example), the generation of suitable finite axiomatizations can be completely automatized, essentially by expressing the matrix tables via inference rules. In this chapter we illustrate how two formalisms, the 3-labelled calculi of Baaz, Fermüller and Zach and the multiple-conclusion (or Set-Set) Hilbert-style calculi of Shoesmith and Smiley, may be uniformly employed to axiomatize logics defined by a three-valued logical matrix. The generating procedure common to both formalisms can be described as follows: first (i) convert the matrix semantics into rule form (we refer to this step as the generating subprocedure) and then (ii) simplify the set of rules thus obtained, essentially relying on the defining properties of any Tarskian consequence relation (we refer to this step as the streamlining subprocedure). We illustrate through some examples that, if a minimal expressiveness assumption is met (namely, if the matrix defining the logic is monadic), then it is straightforward to define effective translations guaranteeing the equivalence between the 3-labelled and the Set-Set approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Finite two-dimensional proof systems for non-finitely axiomatizable logics

The characterizing properties of a proof-theoretical presentation of a given logic may hang on the choice of proof formalism, on the shape of the logical rules and of the sequents manipulated by a given proof system, on the underlying notion of consequence, and even on the expressiveness of its linguistic resources and on the logical framework into which it is embedded. Standard (one-dimensional) logics determined by (non-deterministic) logical matrices are known to be axiomatizable by analytic and possibly finite proof systems as soon as they turn out to satisfy a certain constraint of sufficient expressiveness. In this paper we introduce a recipe for cooking up a two-dimensional logical matrix (or B-matrix) by the combination of two (possibly partial) non-deterministic logical matrices. We will show that such a combination may result in B-matrices satisfying the property of sufficient expressiveness, even when the input matrices are not sufficiently expressive in isolation, and we will use this result to show that one-dimensional logics that are not finitely axiomatizable may inhabit finitely axiomatizable two-dimensional logics, becoming, thus, finitely axiomatizable by the addition of an extra dimension. We will illustrate the said construction using a well-known logic of formal inconsistency called mCi. We will first prove that this logic is not finitely axiomatizable by a one-dimensional (generalized) Hilbert-style system. Then, taking advantage of a known 5-valued non-deterministic logical matrix for this logic, we will combine it with another one, conveniently chosen so as to give rise to a B-matrix that is axiomatized by a two-dimensional Hilbert-style system that is both finite and analytic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Logics of Perfect Paradefinite Algebras

The present study shows how to enrich De Morgan algebras with a perfection operator that allows one to express the Boolean properties of negation-consistency and negation-determinedness. The variety of perfect paradefinite algebras thus obtained (PP-algebras) is shown to be term-equivalent to the variety of involutive Stone algebras, introduced by R. Cignoli and M. Sagastume, and more recently studied from a logical perspective by M. Figallo-L. Cantú and by S. Marcelino-U. Rivieccio. This equivalence plays an important role in the investigation of the 1-assertional logic and of the order-preserving logic associated to PP-algebras. The latter logic (here called PP<=) is characterized by a single 6-valued matrix and is shown to be a Logic of Formal Inconsistency and Formal Undeterminedness. We axiomatize PP<= by means of an analytic finite Hilbert-style calculus, and we present an axiomatization procedure that covers the logics corresponding to other classes of De Morgan algebras enriched by a perfection operator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access