BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Umberto Rivieccio

Umberto Rivieccio contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer Sciencemath.LO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Generating proof systems for three-valued propositional logics

In general, providing an axiomatization for an arbitrary logic is a task that may require some ingenuity. In the case of logics defined by a finite logical matrix (three-valued logics being a particularly simple example), the generation of suitable finite axiomatizations can be completely automatized, essentially by expressing the matrix tables via inference rules. In this chapter we illustrate how two formalisms, the 3-labelled calculi of Baaz, Fermüller and Zach and the multiple-conclusion (or Set-Set) Hilbert-style calculi of Shoesmith and Smiley, may be uniformly employed to axiomatize logics defined by a three-valued logical matrix. The generating procedure common to both formalisms can be described as follows: first (i) convert the matrix semantics into rule form (we refer to this step as the generating subprocedure) and then (ii) simplify the set of rules thus obtained, essentially relying on the defining properties of any Tarskian consequence relation (we refer to this step as the streamlining subprocedure). We illustrate through some examples that, if a minimal expressiveness assumption is met (namely, if the matrix defining the logic is monadic), then it is straightforward to define effective translations guaranteeing the equivalence between the 3-labelled and the Set-Set approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Algebraizability of the Logic of Quasi-N4-Lattices

The class of quasi-N4-lattices (QN4-lattices) was introduced as a common generalization of quasi-Nelson algebras and N4-lattices, in such a way that N4-lattices are precisely the QN4-lattices satisfying the double negation law (~~x = x) and quasi-Nelson algebras are the QN4-lattices satisfying the explosive law (x ^ ~x) -> y = ((x ^ ~x) -> y) -> ((x ^ ~x) -> y). In this paper we introduce, via a Hilbert-style presentation, a logic (L_QN4) whose algebraic semantics is a class of algebras that we show to be term-equivalent to QN4-lattices. The result is obtained by showing that the calculus introduced by us is algebraizable in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi, and its equivalent algebraic semantics is term-equivalent to the class of QN4-lattices. As a prospect for future investigation, we consider the question of how one could place L_QN4 within the family of relevance logics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Logics of Perfect Paradefinite Algebras

The present study shows how to enrich De Morgan algebras with a perfection operator that allows one to express the Boolean properties of negation-consistency and negation-determinedness. The variety of perfect paradefinite algebras thus obtained (PP-algebras) is shown to be term-equivalent to the variety of involutive Stone algebras, introduced by R. Cignoli and M. Sagastume, and more recently studied from a logical perspective by M. Figallo-L. Cantú and by S. Marcelino-U. Rivieccio. This equivalence plays an important role in the investigation of the 1-assertional logic and of the order-preserving logic associated to PP-algebras. The latter logic (here called PP<=) is characterized by a single 6-valued matrix and is shown to be a Logic of Formal Inconsistency and Formal Undeterminedness. We axiomatize PP<= by means of an analytic finite Hilbert-style calculus, and we present an axiomatization procedure that covers the logics corresponding to other classes of De Morgan algebras enriched by a perfection operator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Finite axiomatizability of logics of distributive lattices with negation

This paper focuses on order-preserving logics defined from varieties of distributive lattices with negation, and in particular on the problem of whether these can be axiomatized by means of finite Hilbert calculi. On the side of negative results, we provide a syntactic condition on the equational presentation of a variety that entails failure of finite axiomatizability for the corresponding logic. An application of this result is that the logic of all distributive lattices with negation is not finitely axiomatizable; likewise, we establish that the order-preserving logic of the variety of all Ockham algebras is also not finitely axiomatizable. On the positive side, we show that an arbitrary subvariety of semi-De Morgan algebras is axiomatized by a finite number of equations if and only if the corresponding order-preserving logic is axiomatized by a finite Hilbert calculus. This equivalence also holds for every subvariety of a Berman variety of Ockham algebras. We obtain, as a corollary, a new proof that the implication-free fragment of intuitionistic logic is finitely axiomatizable, as well as a new Hilbert calculus for it. Our proofs are constructive in that they allow us to effectively convert an equational presentation of a variety of algebras into a Hilbert calculus for the corresponding order-preserving logic, and vice versa. We also consider the assertional logics associated to the above-mentioned varieties, showing in particular that the assertional logics of finitely axiomatizable subvarieties of semi-De Morgan algebras are finitely axiomatizable as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

An Algebraic Study of Bilattice-based Logics

The aim of this work is to develop a study from the perspective of Abstract Algebraic Logic of some bilattice-based logical systems introduced in the nineties by Ofer Arieli and Arnon Avron. The motivation for such an investigation has two main roots. On the one hand there is an interest in bilattices as an elegant formalism that gave rise in the last two decades to a variety of applications, especially in the field of Theoretical Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence. In this respect, the present study aims to be a contribution to a better understanding of the mathematical and logical framework that underlie these applications. On the other hand, our interest in bilattice-based logics comes from Abstract Algebraic Logic. In very general terms, algebraic logic can be described as the study of the connections between algebra and logic. One of the main reasons that motivate this study is the possibility to treat logical problems with algebraic methods and viceversa: this is accomplished by associating to a logical system a class of algebraic models that can be regarded as the algebraic counterpart of that logic. Starting from the work of Tarski and his collaborators, the method of algebraizing logics has been increasingly developed and generalized. In the last two decades, algebraic logicians have focused their attention on the process of algebraization itself: this kind of investigation forms now a subfield of algebraic logic known as Abstract Algebraic Logic (which we abbreviate AAL).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access