BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vítor Albiero

Vítor Albiero contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer VisionArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The Gender Gap in Face Recognition Accuracy Is a Hairy Problem

It is broadly accepted that there is a "gender gap" in face recognition accuracy, with females having higher false match and false non-match rates. However, relatively little is known about the cause(s) of this gender gap. Even the recent NIST report on demographic effects lists "analyze cause and effect" under "what we did not do". We first demonstrate that female and male hairstyles have important differences that impact face recognition accuracy. In particular, compared to females, male facial hair contributes to creating a greater average difference in appearance between different male faces. We then demonstrate that when the data used to estimate recognition accuracy is balanced across gender for how hairstyles occlude the face, the initially observed gender gap in accuracy largely disappears. We show this result for two different matchers, and analyzing images of Caucasians and of African-Americans. These results suggest that future research on demographic variation in accuracy should include a check for balanced quality of the test data as part of the problem formulation. To promote reproducible research, matchers, attribute classifiers, and datasets used in this research are/will be publicly available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Method for Curation of Web-Scraped Face Image Datasets

Web-scraped, in-the-wild datasets have become the norm in face recognition research. The numbers of subjects and images acquired in web-scraped datasets are usually very large, with number of images on the millions scale. A variety of issues occur when collecting a dataset in-the-wild, including images with the wrong identity label, duplicate images, duplicate subjects and variation in quality. With the number of images being in the millions, a manual cleaning procedure is not feasible. But fully automated methods used to date result in a less-than-ideal level of clean dataset. We propose a semi-automated method, where the goal is to have a clean dataset for testing face recognition methods, with similar quality across men and women, to support comparison of accuracy across gender. Our approach removes near-duplicate images, merges duplicate subjects, corrects mislabeled images, and removes images outside a defined range of pose and quality. We conduct the curation on the Asian Face Dataset (AFD) and VGGFace2 test dataset. The experiments show that a state-of-the-art method achieves a much higher accuracy on the datasets after they are curated. Finally, we release our cleaned versions of both datasets to the research community.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracy

We present a comprehensive analysis of how and why face recognition accuracy differs between men and women. We show that accuracy is lower for women due to the combination of (1) the impostor distribution for women having a skew toward higher similarity scores, and (2) the genuine distribution for women having a skew toward lower similarity scores. We show that this phenomenon of the impostor and genuine distributions for women shifting closer towards each other is general across datasets of African-American, Caucasian, and Asian faces. We show that the distribution of facial expressions may differ between male/female, but that the accuracy difference persists for image subsets rated confidently as neutral expression. The accuracy difference also persists for image subsets rated as close to zero pitch angle. Even when removing images with forehead partially occluded by hair/hat, the same impostor/genuine accuracy difference persists. We show that the female genuine distribution improves when only female images without facial cosmetics are used, but that the female impostor distribution also degrades at the same time. Lastly, we show that the accuracy difference persists even if a state-of-the-art deep learning method is trained from scratch using training data explicitly balanced between male and female images and subjects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?

Deep learning methods have greatly increased the accuracy of face recognition, but an old problem still persists: accuracy is usually higher for men than women. It is often speculated that lower accuracy for women is caused by under-representation in the training data. This work investigates female under-representation in the training data is truly the cause of lower accuracy for females on test data. Using a state-of-the-art deep CNN, three different loss functions, and two training datasets, we train each on seven subsets with different male/female ratios, totaling forty two trainings, that are tested on three different datasets. Results show that (1) gender balance in the training data does not translate into gender balance in the test accuracy, (2) the "gender gap" in test accuracy is not minimized by a gender-balanced training set, but by a training set with more male images than female images, and (3) training to minimize the accuracy gap does not result in highest female, male or average accuracy

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Is Face Recognition Sexist? No, Gendered Hairstyles and Biology Are

Recent news articles have accused face recognition of being "biased", "sexist" or "racist". There is consensus in the research literature that face recognition accuracy is lower for females, who often have both a higher false match rate and a higher false non-match rate. However, there is little published research aimed at identifying the cause of lower accuracy for females. For instance, the 2019 Face Recognition Vendor Test that documents lower female accuracy across a broad range of algorithms and datasets also lists "Analyze cause and effect" under the heading "What we did not do". We present the first experimental analysis to identify major causes of lower face recognition accuracy for females on datasets where previous research has observed this result. Controlling for equal amount of visible face in the test images reverses the apparent higher false non-match rate for females. Also, principal component analysis indicates that images of two different females are inherently more similar than of two different males, potentially accounting for a difference in false match rates.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access