Source author record

Vincent Schellekens

Vincent Schellekens appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

ROP inception: signal estimation with quadratic random sketching

Rank-one projections (ROP) of matrices and quadratic random sketching of signals support several data processing and machine learning methods, as well as recent imaging applications, such as phase retrieval or optical processing units. In this paper, we demonstrate how signal estimation can be operated directly through such quadratic sketches--equivalent to the ROPs of the "lifted signal" obtained as its outer product with itself--without explicitly reconstructing that signal. Our analysis relies on showing that, up to a minor debiasing trick, the ROP measurement operator satisfies a generalised sign product embedding (SPE) property. In a nutshell, the SPE shows that the scalar product of a signal sketch with the "sign" of the sketch of a given pattern approximates the square of the projection of that signal on this pattern. This thus amounts to an insertion (an "inception") of a ROP model inside a ROP sketch. The effectiveness of our approach is evaluated in several synthetic experiments.

preprint2021arXiv

Asymmetric compressive learning guarantees with applications to quantized sketches

The compressive learning framework reduces the computational cost of training on large-scale datasets. In a sketching phase, the data is first compressed to a lightweight sketch vector, obtained by mapping the data samples through a well-chosen feature map, and averaging those contributions. In a learning phase, the desired model parameters are then extracted from this sketch by solving an optimization problem, which also involves a feature map. When the feature map is identical during the sketching and learning phases, formal statistical guarantees (excess risk bounds) have been proven. However, the desirable properties of the feature map are different during sketching and learning (e.g. quantized outputs, and differentiability, respectively). We thus study the relaxation where this map is allowed to be different for each phase. First, we prove that the existing guarantees carry over to this asymmetric scheme, up to a controlled error term, provided some Limited Projected Distortion (LPD) property holds. We then instantiate this framework to the setting of quantized sketches, by proving that the LPD indeed holds for binary sketch contributions. Finally, we further validate the approach with numerical simulations, including a large-scale application in audio event classification.

preprint2020arXiv

Compressive Learning of Generative Networks

Generative networks implicitly approximate complex densities from their sampling with impressive accuracy. However, because of the enormous scale of modern datasets, this training process is often computationally expensive. We cast generative network training into the recent framework of compressive learning: we reduce the computational burden of large-scale datasets by first harshly compressing them in a single pass as a single sketch vector. We then propose a cost function, which approximates the Maximum Mean Discrepancy metric, but requires only this sketch, which makes it time- and memory-efficient to optimize.

preprint2020arXiv

When compressive learning fails: blame the decoder or the sketch?

In compressive learning, a mixture model (a set of centroids or a Gaussian mixture) is learned from a sketch vector, that serves as a highly compressed representation of the dataset. This requires solving a non-convex optimization problem, hence in practice approximate heuristics (such as CLOMPR) are used. In this work we explore, by numerical simulations, properties of this non-convex optimization landscape and those heuristics.