BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vijay V. Vazirani

Vijay V. Vazirani contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Science and Game TheoryComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsecon.THmath.COData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Robust Stable Matchings: Dealing with Changes in Preferences

We study stable matchings that are robust to preference changes in the two-sided stable matching setting of Gale and Shapley [GS62]. Given two instances $A$ and $B$ on the same set of agents, a matching is said to be robust if it is stable under both instances. This notion captures desirable robustness properties in matching markets where preferences may evolve, be misreported, or be subject to uncertainty. While the classical theory of stable matchings reveals rich lattice, algorithmic, and polyhedral structure for a single instance, it is unclear which of these properties persist when stability is required across multiple instances. Our work initiates a systematic study of the structural and computational behavior of robust stable matchings under increasingly general models of preference changes. We analyze robustness under a hierarchy of perturbation models: 1. a single upward shift in one agent's preference list, 2. an arbitrary permutation change by a single agent, and 3. arbitrary preference changes by multiple agents on both sides. For each regime, we characterize when: 1. the set of robust stable matchings forms a sublattice, 2. the lattice of robust stable matchings admits a succinct Birkhoff partial order enabling efficient enumeration, 3. worker-optimal and firm-optimal robust stable matchings can be computed efficiently, and 4. the robust stable matching polytope is integral (by studying its LP formulation). We provide explicit counterexamples demonstrating where these structural and geometric properties break down, and complement these results with XP-time algorithms running in $O(n^k)$ time, parameterized by $k$, the number of agents whose preferences change. Our results precisely delineate the boundary between tractable and intractable cases for robust stable matchings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Structural and Algorithmic Study of Stable Matching Lattices of "Nearby" Instances, with Applications

Recently MV18 identified and initiated work on the new problem of understanding structural relationships between the lattices of solutions of two "nearby" instances of stable matching. They also gave an application of their work to finding a robust stable matching. However, the types of changes they allowed in going from instance $A$ to $B$ were very restricted, namely any one agent executes an upward shift. In this paper, we allow any one agent to permute its preference list arbitrarily. Let $M_A$ and $M_B$ be the sets of stable matchings of the resulting pair of instances $A$ and $B$, and let $\mathcal{L}_A$ and $\mathcal{L}_B$ be the corresponding lattices of stable matchings. We prove that the matchings in $M_A \cap M_B$ form a sublattice of both $\mathcal{L}_A$ and $\mathcal{L}_B$ and those in $M_A \setminus M_B$ form a join semi-sublattice of $\mathcal{L}_A$. These properties enable us to obtain a polynomial time algorithm for not only finding a stable matching in $M_A \cap M_B$, but also for obtaining the partial order, as promised by Birkhoff's Representation Theorem, thereby enabling us to generate all matchings in this sublattice. Our algorithm also helps solve a version of the robust stable matching problem. We discuss another potential application, namely obtaining new insights into the incentive compatibility properties of the Gale-Shapley Deferred Acceptance Algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

New Characterizations of Core Imputations of Matching and $b$-Matching Games

We give new characterizations of core imputations for the following games: * The assignment game. * Concurrent games, i.e., general graph matching games having non-empty core. * The unconstrained bipartite $b$-matching game (edges can be matched multiple times). * The constrained bipartite $b$-matching game (edges can be matched at most once). The classic paper of Shapley and Shubik \cite{Shapley1971assignment} showed that core imputations of the assignment game are precisely optimal solutions to the dual of the LP-relaxation of the game. Building on this, Deng et al. \cite{Deng1999algorithms} gave a general framework which yields analogous characterizations for several fundamental combinatorial games. Interestingly enough, their framework does not apply to the last two games stated above. In turn, we show that some of the core imputations of these games correspond to optimal dual solutions and others do not. This leads to the tantalizing question of understanding the origins of the latter. We also present new characterizations of the profits accrued by agents and teams in core imputations of the first two games. Our characterization for the first game is stronger than that for the second; the underlying reason is that the characterization of vertices of the Birkhoff polytope is stronger than that of the Balinski polytope.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Real Polynomial for Bipartite Graph Minimum Weight Perfect Matchings

In a recent paper, Beniamini and Nisan gave a closed-form formula for the unique multilinear polynomial for the Boolean function determining whether a given bipartite graph $G \subseteq K_{n,n}$ has a perfect matching, together with an efficient algorithm for computing the coefficients of the monomials of this polynomial. We give the following generalization: Given an arbitrary non-negative weight function $w$ on the edges of $K_{n,n}$, consider its set of minimum weight perfect matchings. We give the real multilinear polynomial for the Boolean function which determines if a graph $G \subseteq K_{n,n}$ contains one of these minimum weight perfect matchings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Computational Complexity of the Hylland-Zeckhauser Scheme for One-Sided Matching Markets

In 1979, Hylland and Zeckhauser \cite{hylland} gave a simple and general scheme for implementing a one-sided matching market using the power of a pricing mechanism. Their method has nice properties -- it is incentive compatible in the large and produces an allocation that is Pareto optimal -- and hence it provides an attractive, off-the-shelf method for running an application involving such a market. With matching markets becoming ever more prevalant and impactful, it is imperative to finally settle the computational complexity of this scheme. We present the following partial resolution: 1. A combinatorial, strongly polynomial time algorithm for the special case of $0/1$ utilities. 2. An example that has only irrational equilibria, hence proving that this problem is not in PPAD. Furthermore, its equilibria are disconnected, hence showing that the problem does not admit a convex programming formulation. 3. A proof of membership of the problem in the class FIXP. We leave open the (difficult) question of determining if the problem is FIXP-hard. Settling the status of the special case when utilities are in the set $\{0, {\frac 1 2}, 1 \}$ appears to be even more difficult.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Settling the Complexity of Arrow-Debreu Markets under Leontief and PLC Utilities, using the Classes FIXP and \Exists-R

This paper resolves two of the handful of remaining questions on the computability of market equilibria, a central theme within algorithmic game theory (AGT). Our results are as follows: 1. We show FIXP-hardness of computing equilibria in Arrow-Debreu markets under Leontief utility functions, and Arrow-Debreu markets under linear utility functions and Leontief production sets. We note that these are the first FIXP-hardness results ever since the introduction of the class FIXP and the hardness of 3-Nash established therein. 2. We note that for the problems stated above, the corresponding results showing membership in FIXP were established after imposing suitable sufficiency conditions to render the problems total, as is customary in economics. However, if all instances are under consideration, then in both cases we prove that the problem of deciding if a given instance admits an equilibrium is \Exists-R-complete, where \Exists-R is the class of decision problems which can be reduced in polynomial time to Existential Theory of the Reals. 3. For Arrow-Debreu markets under Leontief utility functions and a constant number of agents, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for computing an equilibrium. This settles part of an open problem of Devanur and Kannan (FOCS'08). We note that PLC utilities are about the most general utilities of interest in economics and several fundamental utility functions studied within AGT are special cases of it. Several important problems, which have been shown to be in FIXP, are waiting for proofs of FIXP-hardness. In this context, our technique of reducing from 3-Nash to Multivariate Polynomial Equations and then to the problem is likely to be useful in the future.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stability-Preserving, Time-Efficient Mechanisms for School Choice in Two Rounds

We address the following dynamic version of the school choice question: a city, named City, admits students in two temporally-separated rounds, denoted $\mathcal{R}_1$ and $\mathcal{R}_2$. In round $\mathcal{R}_1$, the capacity of each school is fixed and mechanism $\mathcal{M}_1$ finds a student optimal stable matching. In round $\mathcal{R}_2$, certain parameters change, e.g., new students move into the City or the City is happy to allocate extra seats to specific schools. We study a number of Settings of this kind and give polynomial time algorithms for obtaining a stable matching for the new situations. It is well established that switching the school of a student midway, unsynchronized with her classmates, can cause traumatic effects. This fact guides us to two types of results, the first simply disallows any re-allocations in round $\mathcal{R}_2$, and the second asks for a stable matching that minimizes the number of re-allocations. For the latter, we prove that the stable matchings which minimize the number of re-allocations form a sublattice of the lattice of stable matchings. Observations about incentive compatibility are woven into these results. We also give a third type of results, namely proofs of NP-hardness for a mechanism for round $\mathcal{R}_2$ under certain settings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access