BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Victor Bouvier

Victor Bouvier contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputer Vision

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Performance Prediction Under Dataset Shift

ML models deployed in production often have to face unknown domain changes, fundamentally different from their training settings. Performance prediction models carry out the crucial task of measuring the impact of these changes on model performance. We study the generalization capabilities of various performance prediction models to new domains by learning on generated synthetic perturbations. Empirical validation on a benchmark of ten tabular datasets shows that models based upon state-of-the-art shift detection metrics are not expressive enough to generalize to unseen domains, while Error Predictors bring a consistent improvement in performance prediction under shift. We additionally propose a natural and effortless uncertainty estimation of the predicted accuracy that ensures reliable use of performance predictors. Our implementation is available at https: //github.com/dataiku-research/performance_prediction_under_shift.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Test-Time Adaptation with Principal Component Analysis

Machine Learning models are prone to fail when test data are different from training data, a situation often encountered in real applications known as distribution shift. While still valid, the training-time knowledge becomes less effective, requiring a test-time adaptation to maintain high performance. Following approaches that assume batch-norm layer and use their statistics for adaptation, we propose a Test-Time Adaptation with Principal Component Analysis (TTAwPCA), which presumes a fitted PCA and adapts at test time a spectral filter based on the singular values of the PCA for robustness to corruptions. TTAwPCA combines three components: the output of a given layer is decomposed using a Principal Component Analysis (PCA), filtered by a penalization of its singular values, and reconstructed with the PCA inverse transform. This generic enhancement adds fewer parameters than current methods. Experiments on CIFAR-10-C and CIFAR- 100-C demonstrate the effectiveness and limits of our method using a unique filter of 2000 parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards Clear Expectations for Uncertainty Estimation

If Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is crucial to achieve trustworthy Machine Learning (ML), most UQ methods suffer from disparate and inconsistent evaluation protocols. We claim this inconsistency results from the unclear requirements the community expects from UQ. This opinion paper offers a new perspective by specifying those requirements through five downstream tasks where we expect uncertainty scores to have substantial predictive power. We design these downstream tasks carefully to reflect real-life usage of ML models. On an example benchmark of 7 classification datasets, we did not observe statistical superiority of state-of-the-art intrinsic UQ methods against simple baselines. We believe that our findings question the very rationale of why we quantify uncertainty and call for a standardized protocol for UQ evaluation based on metrics proven to be relevant for the ML practitioner.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust Domain Adaptation: Representations, Weights and Inductive Bias

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) has attracted a lot of attention in the last ten years. The emergence of Domain Invariant Representations (IR) has improved drastically the transferability of representations from a labelled source domain to a new and unlabelled target domain. However, a potential pitfall of this approach, namely the presence of \textit{label shift}, has been brought to light. Some works address this issue with a relaxed version of domain invariance obtained by weighting samples, a strategy often referred to as Importance Sampling. From our point of view, the theoretical aspects of how Importance Sampling and Invariant Representations interact in UDA have not been studied in depth. In the present work, we present a bound of the target risk which incorporates both weights and invariant representations. Our theoretical analysis highlights the role of inductive bias in aligning distributions across domains. We illustrate it on standard benchmarks by proposing a new learning procedure for UDA. We observed empirically that weak inductive bias makes adaptation more robust. The elaboration of stronger inductive bias is a promising direction for new UDA algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Target Consistency for Domain Adaptation: when Robustness meets Transferability

Learning Invariant Representations has been successfully applied for reconciling a source and a target domain for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation. By investigating the robustness of such methods under the prism of the cluster assumption, we bring new evidence that invariance with a low source risk does not guarantee a well-performing target classifier. More precisely, we show that the cluster assumption is violated in the target domain despite being maintained in the source domain, indicating a lack of robustness of the target classifier. To address this problem, we demonstrate the importance of enforcing the cluster assumption in the target domain, named Target Consistency (TC), especially when paired with Class-Level InVariance (CLIV). Our new approach results in a significant improvement, on both image classification and segmentation benchmarks, over state-of-the-art methods based on invariant representations. Importantly, our method is flexible and easy to implement, making it a complementary technique to existing approaches for improving transferability of representations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access